Walmart beats key claim in US FTC lawsuit over money transfer fraud
By Jonathan Stempel
NEW YORK, July 5 (Reuters) -A U.S. judge threw out a central claim in a Federal Trade Commission lawsuit accusing Walmart WMT.N of turning a blind eye to scam artists who used its money transfer services to fleece consumers out of hundreds of millions of dollars.
In a decision on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Manish Shah in Chicago rejected a claim that Walmart owes monetary damages for violating the federal Telemarketing Sales Rule.
The rule prohibits deceptive and unfair acts in telemarketing, and bans money transfers to pay for goods and services offered through telemarketing.
Shah said the FTC didn't offer enough specifics on how the world's largest retailer and its allegedly ill-trained employees saw or consciously ignored warning signs that fraudsters used its money transfer services to break the law.
The judge had dismissed the Telemarketing Sales Rule claim in March 2023, leading the FTC to amend its complaint with new details. Wednesday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the FTC cannot pursue the claim again.
Shah said the regulator can still seek an injunction to against violations of an FTC Act provision that prohibits "unfair methods of competition in commerce."
The FTC declined to comment on Friday.
Walmart, based in Bentonville, Arkansas, welcomed the decision.
"We've said all along that the FTC's case is a misguided attempt to expand its enforcement authority, and [the] ruling validates that view," it said in a statement. "Walmart will continue working hard to keep consumers safe from scammers."
Walmart acts as an agent for money transfers by companies such as MoneyGram, Ria EEFT.O and Western Union WU.N. Money can be hard to trace once delivered.
The FTC said fraudsters used many common schemes, including impersonating Internal Revenue Service agents, impersonating family members who needed money from grandparents or other relatives to avoid jail, and telling victims they won lotteries or sweepstakes but owed fees to collect their winnings.
The case is Federal Trade Commission v Walmart Inc, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, No. 22-03372.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Aurora Ellis
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
