US warned Nippon its US Steel bid poses a national security risk, sources say
By Alexandra Alper and David Shepardson
WASHINGTON, Sept 4 (Reuters) -The Biden administration told Nippon Steel 5401.T in a letter on Saturday its $14.9 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel X.N would pose a national security risk by harming the American steel industry, three people said, adding to evidence the U.S. is poised to block it.
The deal faces opposition from numerous Democrats and Republicans, with Vice President and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris saying on Monday she wants U.S. Steel to remain "American owned and operated." Her Republican rival Donald Trump has pledged to block the deal if elected.
In the letter, which has not been previously reported, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) said the deal would damage American steel production and decrease the likelihood that U.S. Steel would continue to aggressively seek trade remedies, the people who were familiar with the matter said, adding that the companies were given until Wednesday to respond.
"The committee has identified risks to the national security of the United States arising as a result of the transaction," the letter said, according to one of the sources.
In their written response, excerpts of which were shared with Reuters, the companies echoed concerns revealed publicly by U.S. Steel on Wednesday. "Rejection of this transaction will lead to the idling of U.S. Steel's blast furnace facilities; ... likely cost thousands of jobs; and ultimately weaken the quality and resiliency of steel supply to U.S. industries."
The U.S., they added, was "acting in this matter not on the basis of the facts, the law, or the United States national security interests, but on the basis of politics and the cynical exploitation thereof by third parties."
The White House declined to comment. The Treasury Department, which leads CFIUS, did not respond to a request for comment.
Spokespeople for Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel declined to comment on the letter but referred Reuters to prior statements arguing that the deal does not create any national security concerns and would strengthen the U.S. steel industry.
"We fully expect to pursue all possible options under the law to ensure this transaction, which is the best future for Pennsylvania, American steelmaking, and all of our stakeholders, closes," the spokesperson for U.S. Steel added.
Reporting by Alexandra Alper; Editing by Chris Sanders, Anna Driver and Muralikumar Anantharaman
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
