US rules on conflict minerals have not reduced violence in Congo, watchdog says
Adds comment from SEC in paragraphs 8-9
LUBUMBASHI, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO, Oct 7 (Reuters) -A U.S. congressional watchdog has found no evidence that a 2012 Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) conflict minerals disclosure rule has reduced violence in Democratic Republic of Congo, it said in a report on Monday.
Armed groups continue to fight for control of gold mines in the east of the Central African country, the U.S. Government Accountability Office said in its report.
It also said the rule - which requires some companies to report on their use of tantalum, tin, tungsten and gold - has likely had no effect in neighbouring countries.
"GAO found no empirical evidence that the rule has decreased the occurrence or level of violence in the eastern DRC, where many mines and armed groups are located," the report said.
"GAO also found the rule was associated with a spread of violence, particularly around informal, small-scale gold mining sites," it said, adding that gold is the most difficult to trace, and easiest to smuggle, of the four minerals covered by the rule.
Congo is the world's top producer of tantalum, which is considered a critical mineral by the United States and the European Union.
The report added that "the SEC disagreed with some of GAO's findings and raised concerns about some of its methodology and analyses." The GAO said it made certain adjustments that did not materially affect its findings.
“As the agency noted in comments shared with GAO, SEC staff has serious concerns about the report, including that it makes assertions and reaches conclusions that rest on several erroneous factual assumptions, draws causal inferences that are not supported by GAO's statistical analyses, and deviates significantly from the GAO's previously issued reports," the SEC said.
"GAO had not shared its final report with the SEC until today, so staff is reviewing it to determine if and how GAO addressed the SEC's concerns," it added.
Last year, GAO said that some U.S. companies buying minerals from Congo and its neighbours were failing to meet disclosure requirements.
On Sept. 30, Bintou Keita, head of the U.N. mission in Congo, told the U.N. Security Council that M23 rebels in the east are generating $300,000 per month in revenues in a coltan-mining region they seized earlier this year.
Reporting by Yassin Kombi; Additional reporting by Sonia Rolley; Writing by Portia Crowe; Editing by Aurora Ellis
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
