US judge blocks Missouri rule curbing socially-conscious investing
By Daniel Wiessner
Aug 14 (Reuters) -A federal judge in Missouri struck down on Wednesday the Republican-led state's rule limiting the ability of financial professionals to consider environmental, social, and corporate governance factors in giving investment advice.
U.S. District Judge Stephen Bough in Kansas City agreed with a trade group, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, that the 2023 rule was invalid because it imposed requirements on investment banks and broker-dealers that do not exist in federal law.
The rule issued by Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft would require investment advisers who consider ESG objectives, such as combating climate change or supporting a social movement, to disclose them to customers and obtain their consent.
Bough said that along with its conflicts with federal law, Missouri's rule violated the free-speech rights of investment advisers and was so vague that it could not be enforced under the U.S. Constitution.
State officials "could have embarked on a public-information campaign to advance their desired message," wrote Bough, an appointee of former Democratic President Barack Obama.
The office of Republican Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, which is defending the rule, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
SIFMA CEO Kenneth Bentsen said Missouri's rule was unnecessary and would upset the uniform nationwide regulation of the securities market guaranteed by federal law, which already requires financial professionals to act in the best interests of their clients.
"That means they cannot put their interests ahead of their customers’ interests when recommending securities," Bentsen said in a statement.
Missouri's rule is part of a broader push by Republicans in some U.S. states to limit the growing consideration of ESG factors by businesses and investors, including employee retirement plans that collectively invest trillions of dollars.
The administration of Republican former President Donald Trump adopted a rule barring retirement plans from considering any "non-pecuniary" factors in making investment decisions. The Biden administration eliminated that rule, a move that is being challenged in court.
Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York; Additional reporting by Ross Kerber in Boston; Editing by Rod Nickel
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
