US FTC's bid to block Kroger-Albertsons merger heads to trial
FTC and US states argue merger will harm competition and raise prices
Kroger and Albertsons claim merger needed to compete with Walmart, Amazon
Kroger pledges $1 billion in price cuts, plans to sell 579 stores if deal proceeds
By Jody Godoy
Aug 26 (Reuters) -The U.S. Federal Trade Commission will argue Kroger's KR.N $25 billion merger with rival grocer Albertsons ACI.N is bad for shoppers and workers when the agency's lawsuit goes to trial in federal court in Portland, Oregon, on Monday.
The FTC and several states sued to block the deal in February, saying it would eliminate competition between the top two traditional supermarket chains in the U.S., spelling higher prices for consumers and less bargaining power for unionized grocery workers.
The case is a high-profile piece of the Biden administration's push to lower prices for consumers, and comes as high grocery bills take prominence in the U.S. presidential race between Vice President Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate, and former President Donald Trump, her Republican opponent.
It is also a key test of FTC Chair Lina Khan's initiative to use antitrust law to boost wages and mobility for workers.
The trial is expected to last around three weeks and feature evidence about how major grocery retailers and smaller rivals set prices and view competition in the industry.
Kroger and Albertsons are asking U.S. District Judge Adrienne Nelson to let the deal proceed, saying the tie-up is necessary to compete with multinational corporations like Walmart WMT.N, the largest grocery retailer in the U.S., bulk shopping mainstay Costco COST.O and Amazon.com AMZN.O, which owns Whole Foods.
The two companies say the lawsuit's focus on traditional supermarkets ignores that consumers typically shop for food at a variety of locations including big-box stores like Target TGT.N and dollar stores such as Dollar Tree DLTR.O.
Kroger has said it will sell 579 of the approximately 5,000 stores it would own if the deal is allowed to go through. Part of the trial will focus on whether buyer C&S Wholesale Grocers can successfully run them.
Kroger has also pledged to lower grocery prices by $1 billion after the merger.
Retailers use multiple levers to lower prices, including negotiating better deals with suppliers, investing in automation in the supply chain or changing the way they label and package products.
Although Kroger said it could not provide more specifics on the details of the price investments, a source familiar with the matter indicated that the reductions will likely focus on essential and high-demand items first.
"It's not going to be peanut butter spread, for instance, initially, but targeted on across a wide range of staples," the source said.
Arizona, California, Illinois, Maryland, Nevada, New Mexico, Oregon, Wyoming and the District of Columbia are pursuing the case alongside the FTC.
Washington and Colorado have filed their own lawsuits to block the merger. The lawsuits are scheduled to go to trial after the Oregon case.
The states all have Kroger and Albertsons locations.
Kroger case tests FTC Chair Khan's bid to protect workers ID:nL1N3KA0OO
Reporting by Jody Godoy and Siddharth Cavale in New York; Editing by Matthew Lewis
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
