US drug industry middlemen defend business model amid accusations of raising patient costs
Recasts with details from hearing in paragraphs 1, 4-9, 10
By Amina Niasse and Bhanvi Satija
July 23 (Reuters) -U.S. pharmaceutical industry middlemen defended their role in the healthcare system during a Congressional hearing on Tuesday after committee members accused them of pushing patients toward expensive treatments even when lower-cost options are available.
A House Committee on Oversight and Accountability report released earlier on Tuesday said it found evidence that these pharmacy benefit managers force drugmakers to pay rebates for placing their branded drugs in a favorable position on their lists of medications covered by various insurance plans.
In testimony before the committee, executives from the top three U.S. drug benefit managers - UnitedHealth UNH.N's OptumRx, Cigna's CI.N ExpressScripts and CVS Health's CVS.N Caremark - said their business models save health plan members money, including plans run by labor unions.
They blamed "patent abuses" by drug manufacturers that delay launches of cheaper generic and biosimilar medicines for the heightened costs to consumers. The launch price of new drugs was also an issue, they said.
Pharmaceutical executives, in turn, have repeatedly said the PBMs are to blame for high prescription drug costs.
CVS Caremark President David Joyner, however, told the committee that last year a new to market drug carried a median annual price of $300,000.
"Humira, Ozempic and Stelara alone costs more than every generic drug combined," he said of AbbVie's ABBV.N top-selling arthritis treatment, Novo Nordisk's NOVOb.CO diabetes drug widely used off label for weight loss, Johnson and Johnson's JNJ.N blockbuster Crohn's disease treatment.
Joyner described the price of GLP-1 drugs used for weight loss as "overwhelming," adding costs would surpass 1.2 trillion dollars annually if all obese people received one.
Novo's NOVOb.CO Ozempic and Wegovy and Eli Lilly's LLY.N Mounjaro drove more than two-thirds of the increased costs for Caremark customers in 2023, according to Joyner.
Committee Chair James Comer, a Republican, accused PBMs of shifting responsibility for drug pricing onto manufacturers.
"That's not what we hear from doctors all across America. That's not what we hear from pharmacists all across America," Comer said.
Pharmacy benefit managers handle prescription drug benefits for health insurance companies, large employers, and Medicare prescription drug plans.
Those businesses at CVS, UnitedHealth and Cigna control 80% of prescription drugs dispensed in the U.S., according to Representative Jamie Raskin, a Democrat.
The three largest intermediaries have used their position "to enact anti-competitive policies" and protect their own profits, the committee said in its report.
It also said the healthcare companies share patient data among business units to steer patients toward pharmacies owned by them.
The companies have also begun moving some operations abroad to avoid transparency and proposed reforms, the report said.
EXPLAINER-Why are US pharmacy benefit managers under fire? https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/why-are-us-pharmacy-benefit-managers-under-fire-2024-04-16/
Reporting by Amina Niasse in New York City and Bhanvi Satija in Bengaluru; Editing by Bill Berkrot
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
