XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

US appeals court voids $564 million verdict against Bank of Montreal in Ponzi case



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>US appeals court voids $564 million verdict against Bank of Montreal in Ponzi case</title></head><body>

By Jonathan Stempel

Sept 12 (Reuters) -Bank of Montreal BMO.TO persuaded a U.S. appeals court on Thursday to throw out a $564 million jury verdict against a subsidiary over its role in an approximately $3.65 billion Ponzi scheme run by convicted Minnesota businessman Tom Petters.

Citing a similar case involving Bernard Madoff, the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said a court-appointed trustee for the now-bankrupt Petters Co could not recover on behalf of its creditors because that firm had helped orchestrate the fraud.

The 3-0 decision by the St. Paul, Minnesota-based court overturned a November 2022 jury verdict, and directed that trustee Douglas Kelley's case against BMO be dismissed.

Lawyers for Kelley did not immediately respond to requests for comment. BMO did not immediately respond to similar requests.

Petters is serving a 50-year prison term after being convicted in 2009 on 20 criminal counts including fraud and money laundering.

Kelley claimed that Petters' former bank, Milwaukee-based Marshall & Ilsley, knew about the Ponzi scheme and ignored red flags of money laundering, enabling Petters to withdraw large sums he wasn't entitled to.

BMO bought M&I in 2011, and Kelley sought to hold it liable.

But the appeals court said the trustee effectively stood in the shoes of Petters Co because that company was equally or more at fault than M&I.

It said that meant BMO was not liable under a legal doctrine known as "in pari delicto."

"Bankruptcy law does not provide a vehicle for PCI or its trustee to proceed unbound by PCI's own wrongdoing," Chief Judge Steven Colloton wrote, referring to Petters Co.

Colloton cited a similar 2013 decision by the federal appeals court in New York that rejected claims that the trustee liquidating Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities made against JPMorgan Chase JPM.N and other banks that Madoff used.

The case is Kelley v BMO Harris Bank NA, 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 23-2551.



Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Cynthia Osterman

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.