XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Sustainable Switch: What a Trump win would mean for clean energy



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Sustainable Switch: What a Trump win would mean for clean energy</title></head><body>

Sept 3 -By Sharon Kimathi

Energy and ESG Editor, Reuters Digital

sharon.kimathi@thomsonreuters.com


Hello!

Today's newsletter tackles three key questions about the U.S. elections and clean energy: What would a Donald Trump presidency mean for climate and energy policies? What is Joe Biden's energy legacy? And what to expect from Kamala Harris if she becomes president.

It seems Trump would rescind many of President Biden's clean energy rules while also speeding approvals of power plants to meet rising U.S. electricity demand.

One of the most significant rollbacks would be removing the U.S. from the Paris agreement on climate change as Trump did during his 2017-2021 White House term.

But what about Biden's presidency? What is his climate and energy legacy?

U.S. oil and gas production hit the highest levels of any country ever, despite his administration's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which contains hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies for clean energy such as wind, solar, hydrogen, geothermal projects.


Axing clean energy laws

Should Trump win the Nov. 5 election, his campaign said he would axe clean energy regulations of Biden and his Democrat opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, on both power plants and vehicle emissions.

Those rules are aimed at slashing carbon emissions from the power industry while also pushing the auto industry to transition to electric cars to cut tailpipe pollution.

Trump "will immediately stop all Biden-Harris policies that distort energy markets, limit consumer choice and drive up the costs on consumers on day one," David Bernhardt, his former Interior Department secretary, told reporters in a call organized by the campaign.


New power plants

Bernhardt said Trump would also implement rapid approvals for energy projects and "the construction of hundreds of new power plants," without detailing how those would be fueled.

Trump would "modernize" the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to speed approvals for new nuclear plants and for existing ones to have their lives extended, Bernhardt said..

"There's been legislation to address some of these issues, but there's a long way to go".

In April, Biden's Environmental Protection Agency finalized rules targeting carbon, air and water pollution from power plants. These will effectively require coal-fired power plants and new natural gas-fired generators in the coming decade to capture emissions.


Not ban fracking

In response to Trump’s proposed policy rollbacks, James Singer, a Harris campaign spokesperson, said the Republican candidate wants to sell out the country’s energy future to Big Oil executives and that under Biden and Harris, "American energy of all kinds has hit record production levels, resulting in hundreds of thousands of new jobs for American workers because of her leadership."

And what about Harris?

Just last week, the Democratic presidential candidate told CNN that she would not ban fracking if elected president.

"As vice president, I did not ban fracking. As president, I will not ban fracking," Harris said.


Talking Points

  • At least 13 people have died in the Philippines due to tropical storm Yagi, while schools and government offices were closed in Manila and nearby provinces on Tuesday because of expected bad weather.

  • French oil major TotalEnergies has signed a $100 million deal to help preserve U.S. forests. The agreement with partners Anew Climate and Aurora Sustainable Lands calls for the reduction of timber harvesting across 300,000 hectares in 10 states.

    • The number of fires in Brazil's Amazon rainforest region for the month of August surged to the highest level since 2010, government data showed, after a record drought that has been plaguing the biome.

    • Volkswagen is considering closing factories in Germany for the first time, in a move that shows the mounting pressure Europe's top carmaker faces from Asian rivals.

    In Conversation

    Frank Altman, founder of Community Reinvestment Fund, a U.S.-based community development financial institution, shares his thoughts on the anti-environment, social and governance (ESG) movement:

    “Anti-ESG rhetoric is on the rise in the United States, and it is simply wrong.

    “The effort to combat climate change must include investors who want to own stocks in companies that are responding responsibly to the climate challenges we are facing.

    “Industries that are responsible for carbon emissions are fueling this backlash in order to maintain their inclusion in investment funds.

    “A recent article in the San Francisco Chronicle pointed out that most participants in 401(k) and 403(b) retirement plans are forced to invest in carbon-emitting firms as part of indexed funds.

    “Those who seek to ban consideration of ESG factors in investment decisions are simply removing choice from investors.

    “These retirement plans should include options for plan participants to make their own choices regarding ESG investments.

    “The same concept of allowing investors choices applies to companies engaged in the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) movement.

    “The American population is growing more diverse daily, and it makes good business sense to serve this diverse market. DEI and excellence go hand in hand.”

    ESG Lens

    Last week, I highlighted the green backlash affecting European politics as Germany’s far-right AfD party is trying to pick up rural voters who oppose the growth of wind energy.

    This week, the AfD was a big winner of the German state vote that dealt a heavy blow to the parties in Chancellor Olaf Scholz's government, securing 33.2% in Thuringia in its first regional election, and also gaining almost as many votes as the conservatives in Saxony.

    ESG Spotlight

    Today’s spotlight shines a light on the positive developments after authorities in Brazil cleaned up their waters.

    Sea turtles in the Guanabara Bay of Rio de Janeiro are getting healthier after struggling for years with a tumor disease that ultimately leads to their death.

    Scientists said this came after authorities made an effort to clean up the water of the natural harbor. Research has linked fibropapillomatosis, a benign tumor in sea turtles, to both a virus and environmental factors.

    Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also subscribe here.


    The far-right AfD did well in two Germany state elections https://reut.rs/4g6zXCx


    Editing by Alexander Smith

    </body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.