Supreme Court 'swipe fees' ruling may open US regulations to more suits
Recasts with ruling
By John Kruzel
WASHINGTON, July 1 (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday revived a North Dakota convenience store's challenge to a Federal Reserve regulation on debit card "swipe fees" in a ruling that could make it easier for businesses to try to undo longstanding federal rules.
The 6-3 decision reversed a lower court's dismissal of the 2021 lawsuit by the Corner Post, located in Watford City, challenging the 2011 rule governing the amount businesses pay banks when customers use debit cards to make purchases. The dismissal had been based on the store missing a six-year statue of limitations that generally applies to such litigation.
The ruling came on the final day of the Supreme Court's term that began in October.
Swipe fees, also called interchange fees, reimburse banks for costs involved in offering debit cards. The fees are determined by Visa V.N, MasterCard MA.N and other card networks, with a cap of 21 cents per transaction set under the Fed rule.
At issue in the case was whether Corner Post was too late when it brought its legal challenge. The store argued that it should not be bound by the six-year statute of limitations to challenge the 2011 regulation because it opened for business in 2018, after that deadline had passed.
Corner Post, backed by various conservative and corporate interest groups including billionaire Charles Koch's network and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, contended that businesses should have wide latitude to challenge regulations they consider unlawful and burdensome.
The store argued that the six-year time limit should not start running until a business is adversely affected - which for Corner Post would be March 2018, when it accepted its first debit card payment.
President Joe Biden's administration, representing the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, had argued that adopting Corner Post's legal position "would substantially expand the class of potential challengers" to government regulations and threatens to "increase the burdens on agencies and courts."
A group of small business associations had filed a brief urging the Supreme Court to maintain a strict statute of limitations that begins at the time a regulation is finalized. They said that allowing lawsuits beyond this deadline "would create chaos, uncertainty and inconsistent regulatory regimes for the nation's regulated industries and the American people the regulations seek to serve."
Before congressional passage of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street reform law that directed the Fed to cap swipe fees, retailers paid as much as 44 cents per transaction, which had made it hard for small businesses to accept debit cards.
Retailers that expected a much lower cap sued after the Fed set it at 21 cents per transaction. The Supreme Court in 2015 left in place a lower court's ruling backing the regulation.
Corner Post in its 2021 lawsuit argued that the rule defied congressional intent and was "arbitrary and capricious" under a federal law called the Administrative Procedure Act.
U.S. District Judge Daniel Traynor in 2022 dismissed the lawsuit. The St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld Traynor's decision, setting up the Supreme Court appeal.
The Fed last year proposed cutting the current cap to 14.4 cents per transaction.
US Supreme Court wrestles with bid to challenge debit card 'swipe fee' rule nL2N3F51XG
Mastercard, Visa lose bid to end parts of swipe fee litigation nL2N3FP1GB
US Fed proposes shrinking fees banks charge on debit card transactions nL1N3BV240
Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
