Stripe would be an ugly pattern for Silicon Valley
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Robert Cyran
NEW YORK, July 16 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Stripe develops software to facilitate payments, but its financial backers are struggling to receive theirs. Started by John and Patrick Collison in 2009, the financial technology company has given no sign of going public soon, making it hard for venture capitalists to cash out. Enter Sequoia Capital with a plan that will buy some time, but one which if applied too often would distort the investment model.
Most successful 15-year-old startups already have been bought by a bigger rival or proceeded with an initial public offering. Stripe hasn’t. To appease limited partners itchy to exit funds from 2009 to 2012, Sequoia is offering to buy up to about $860 million of shares using newer funds.
There’s no obvious reason for an IPO. Although it raised $6.5 billion last year, Stripe says the business generates more cash than it spends. Outside investors enable employees to sell their stakes through tender offers, such as the nearly $700 million one in April. The company avoids regulatory and disclosure hassles while fetching a higher valuation than it probably could in public markets.
Total payment volume at Stripe increased 25% last year, exceeding $1 trillion. European rival Adyen ADYEN.AS processed a similar amount and is expanding just as quickly, but its market capitalization is less than $40 billion. Stripe, at $70 billion, may have more growth ahead of it and new services like automated billing also look promising. In today’s choppy IPO markets, however, it might be hard to persuade investors to pay for the prospects.
Sequoia’s plan indicates confidence. It has invested more than $500 million in Stripe, according to a letter to investors published by Axios this week. For now, though, it has no way to turn a $9 billion return on paper into reality.
New Sequoia funds, including an open-ended one, will buy out investors in older ones. If successful, it will plaster over an idiosyncratic problem. There’s liquidity for those who want it, a fresh opportunity to get behind the Collisons, and Stripe avoids the public spotlight for longer.
The problem would be too many Silicon Valley founders getting similar ideas. If companies like Elon Musk’s SpaceX decide they want to stay private, it would significantly alter the venture capital business. The idea has always been to get in early on up-and-comers and get paid out a few years later. Paying steep fees to own chunks of large, mature companies for an indeterminate period of time is something different altogether.
Follow @rob_cyran on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Venture capital firm Sequoia Capital is using newer funds in an offer to buy as much as $861 million of Stripe shares held by limited partners in its funds established between 2009 and 2012 for $27 apiece, imputing a $70 billion valuation, Axios reported on July 15.
Sequoia said in a letter to investors it had invested a total of $517 million in Stripe, now worth $9.8 billion at the latest valuation.
Number of US tech IPOs has slowed https://reut.rs/4f3iCdc
Editing by Jeffrey Goldfarb and Pranav Kiran
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
