Smith & Nephew faces long and painful activist fix
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.
By Aimee Donnellan
LONDON, July 4 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Smith & Nephew SN.L should prepare for a long and painful activist treatment. On Thursday, Swedish investor Cevian Capital announced it had taken a 5% stake in the $11 billion UK-listed maker of hip joints and wound care kit. Its medicine is likely to involve stripping out costs. If that fails, more radical remedies like a breakup may be necessary.
Smith & Nephew has many ingredients activists look for in a target. Its share price has fallen 42% over the past five years, whereas the FTSE 100 Index .FTSE is up by 10%. Endless management churn can’t have helped: during that same period the group has had three CEOs and three chief financial officers. Its boss, Deepak Nath, has introduced a 12-point plan to increase the company’s performance.
Investors, however, are not convinced. Including debt, Smith & Nephew is valued at $14 billion, just 13 times its expected operating profit in 2025, according to LSEG data, a steep discount to its five-year average of 18 times. Cevian has not yet disclosed its demands, but the activist could push Nath to take a bigger axe to Smith & Nephew’s bloated cost base, which resulted in an operating margin of just 17% last year. U.S.-listed rival Stryker SYK.N generated a 24% margin.
Assume Smith & Nephew can close half the profitability gap with Stryker, and its EBIT margin would reach 21%. Apply that to the $6.7 billion of revenue the London-listed firm is expected to deliver in 2027, and operating profit could total $1.4 billion that year. Next, assume a leaner, more profitable Smith & Nephew is valued at 17 times forward EBIT, again closing half the gap with Stryker’s multiple, and its enterprise value could exceed $24 billion in two years. That’s nearly 70% higher than its current worth.
If Nath fails, deeper surgery may be necessary. Last year the orthopaedic division that makes artificial hip and knee joints was the slowest growing of Smith & Nephew’s business units. Selling that to a rival, like Stryker, could free up cash to invest in the other two units, wound care and sports injuries. Alternatively, switching its primary listing to the United States may attract more investors, and a higher valuation. But a recovery is likely to take time. As activist campaigns go, Smith & Nephew will be more than a quick fix.
Follow @aimeedonnellan on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Activist investor Cevian said on July 4 it has taken a 5% stake in Smith & Nephew, the London-listed manufacturer of medical devices.
Shares in Smith & Nephew were up 6.3% at 1,047 pence by 0734 GMT.
Graphic: Smith & Nephew’s valuation is lagging rivals https://reut.rs/3VOCqIp
Editing by Neil Unmack and Oliver Taslic
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
