Salesforce signals CEO pay is easy come, easy go
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Pranav Kiran
TORONTO, July 2 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Sometimes shareholders are asleep at the switch. Other times, they’re quick to pull the trigger. With $246 billion Salesforce CRM.N and its leader Marc Benioff, they seem to be getting antsy. After a year of strong outperformance and then a middling six months, investors have rejected Benioff’s compensation plan. Generosity has limits, even with executive pay.
Though U.S. corporate leaders are often known for outsized paychecks, Benioff’s is high by even those standards. Proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services puts the total package at $43 million,with the large majority of the compensation coming from incentives, stock, and option grants. That is 65% higher than the average CEO pay in a group of peers.
Such generosity might have been easier to justify last year when Salesforce shares returned 4 times the S&P 500 .SPX. But the stock price lags the index year-to-date. Cloud markets are maturing after more than a decade of fast-paced growth. Benioff will need clients to spend more on Salesforce’s products, but customers’ budgets are pre-occupied on things like data centers and chips related to artificial intelligence.
Benioff can turn things around. Adobe ADBE.O and Oracle ORCL.N – companies that are older than Salesforce – saw their shares surge last month after tapping into AI-related demand. But it’s a harder shift for business software firms like Salesforce which are habituated to the so-called “seat model” which involves selling clients subscriptions based on a set number of users rather than how much of the product they consume.
Salesforce’s troubles are reminiscent of Oracle in the early 2010s. Then, Larry Ellison’s firm and Benioff’s own alma mater struggled to boost growth as clients moved their tech into the cloud and away from data centers. For six straight years, shareholders rejected Oracle executives’ compensation plan. Only in 2023, after years of chunky share buybacks, did Ellison start gaining favor for remaining as chairman.
Ellison stepped down as CEO at Oracle in 2014 and let his deputies lead. In the last 10 years, the company’s shares have more than tripled, far outpacing the returns of the S&P 500 Index. Benioff may have more time to show shareholders he can pivot in a world geared towards AI. He just might have to fight to be paid for his efforts in the process.
Follow @PranavKiranBV on X
CONTEXT NEWS
A majority of Salesforce shareholders voted against a compensation plan for its CEO Marc Benioff and other top executives, according to a regulatory filing on July 1.
The resolution to approve the compensation received 339.3 million votes in favor versus 404.8 million against, the filing said.
Advisory firms Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services both recommended that investors vote down the measure.
For the 2024 financial year, Benioff received $39.6 million in total compensation, up from $29.9 million in the prior year.
Graphic: Salesforce shares lag the S&P 500 this year Salesforce shares lag the S&P 500 this year https://reut.rs/4bvmlx0
Editing by Lauren Silva Laughlin and Sharon Lam
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
