XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Roche sues Stanford University, cancer-detection startup over trade secrets



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>UPDATE 1-Roche sues Stanford University, cancer-detection startup over trade secrets</title></head><body>

Updates July 2 story to add response from Foresight in paragraph 3

By Blake Brittain

July 2 (Reuters) -Roche ROG.S has sued Stanford University and medical technology startup Foresight Diagnostics in California federal court, claiming Foresight misused its genetic-sequencing trade secrets to develop competing cancer-detection products.

Roche said in the complaint filed on Monday that Stanford University professors Maximilian Diehn and Ash Alizadeh, whose technology Roche acquired in 2015, secretly created Foresight while working as Roche consultants and stole its technology to use in their new business.

"Roche's accusations that anything was secretive or stolen are meritless," Foresight said in a statement on Tuesday. Foresight also called the lawsuit a "negotiating tactic" and said that it intends to "vigorously defend" against the case.

A spokesperson forRoche declined to comment on the lawsuit on Tuesday. Spokespeople for Stanford did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

According to the complaint, Roche bought Diehn and Alizadeh's Capp Medical in 2015 along with its technology for analyzing DNA from a patient's bloodstream to detect cancer. Roche said that it paid "tens of millions of dollars" for the technology and uses it in its Avenio cancer-detection kits.

The lawsuit said that Diehn, Alizadeh and fellow Stanford professor David Kurtz worked for Roche when they founded Boulder, Colorado-based Foresight in 2020. The complaint accused Foresight of misusing the technology that Roche acquired to raise more than $70 million in funding for its own cancer-detection business.

Roche requested an unspecified amount of money damages and also asked the court to force Stanford and Foresight to hand over patent applications that allegedly cover Roche's technology.


The case is Roche Molecular Systems Inc v. Foresight Diagnostics Inc, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 5:24-cv-03972.

For Roche: Mark Flanagan, Robert Gunther and Christopher Noyes of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr

For Foresight and Stanford: attorney information not yet available


</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.