Nvidia has nothing to fear but a lack of fear
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Robert Cyran
NEW YORK, Sept 4 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Almost $300 billion worth of Nvidia NVDA.O got vaporized on Tuesday. It was the third sell-off in the $2.6 trillion U.S. chipmaker’s shares this year, and like the previous two, it has little basis in industrial reality. The chances are that market volatility and changeable economic data will continue to buffet Nvidia’s stock, but the biggest risk to its valuation could come later, and come from within.
Nvidia is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the race to develop artificial intelligence, as its semiconductors and networking equipment are deployed in data centers used to train and run AI systems. Revenue is expected to double this year to around $125 billion, according to analyst estimates gathered by LSEG. The outlook there hasn’t changed. Giant customers still plan to spend billions on its chips. Meta Platforms META.O, for example, intends to roughly increase its overall capital expenditure this year by around 50%, to $40 billion.
There can still be room for disappointment. The large internet and software firms that form part of its customer base may fail to monetize their AI initiatives enough to justify their $300 billion investment. At Meta, Mark Zuckerberg’s plans for open AI may turn it into a commodity. But there too, nothing has changed.
There are newer threats: the U.S. Department of Justice has accelerated a probe into whether the company unfairly gave preferential pricing and chips to companies that exclusively use Nvidia and shun its rivals, according to Bloomberg. Rival chipmaker Intel INTC.O settled with U.S. regulators over similar issues over a decade ago. But such levies are rarely very damaging. Europe slapped a fine on Intel 15 years ago, yet that case is still ongoing.
If there’s something that should worry investors, it lurks further out – and Intel offers some foreshadowing. That former giant was once the chipmaker to beat. Its peak market capitalization in 2000 of roughly $500 billion is equivalent to nearly $1 trillion in today’s money. But Intel lost its manufacturing edge to specialized manufacturer TSMC 2330.TW and missed out on the shift to chips that power cellphones. Its U.S. settlement played a role, making it easier for upstarts like Nvidia. But that was at root a problem of complacency. Intel stuck to what it knew, longer than it should have.
That kind of risk is hard to price in to a company’s shares, which probably means most investors aren’t pricing it in at all. Andy Grove, Intel’s chief executive just prior to the company’s zenith, said that “only the paranoid survive”. Intel didn’t take him at his word, but Nvidia boss Jensen Huang still can.
Follow @rob_cyran on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Nvida’s stock fell 9.5% on Sept. 3, wiping around $380 billion off the U.S. chipmaker’s market capitalization.
The U.S. Department of Justice sent subpoenas to Nvidia and other companies to investigate whether the chipmaker violated antitrust laws, according to a Bloomberg story on Sept. 3, released after the market closed.
The DOJ is investigating whether Nvidia’s purchase of Run: ai, a software maker, will make it more difficult for customers to use other firm’s chips, and whether Nvidia gives preferential pricing and supply of chips to customers that use Nvidia technology exclusively, according to Bloomberg.
Nvidia's shares have been a wobbly rocket ride https://reut.rs/3XchBav
Editing by John Foley and Pranav Kiran
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
