Norway wealth fund supports Nike shareholder proposal on workers' rights
Norway fund backs proposal for binding agreements with workers
Nike's 9th biggest investor also backs climate targets proposal
Fund opposes Nike executive pay for 5th year in a row
Adds context on sliding sales, paragraph 5, opposition to executive pay, paragraph 10
By Helen Reid and Louise Rasmussen
COPENHAGEN/LONDON, Sept 5 (Reuters) -Norway's wealth fund will back a proposal demanding Nike NKE.N consider whether binding agreements with workers would improve its ability to address human rights issues when sourcing from high-risk countries, the fund said on Thursday.
Ahead of the sportswear giant's annual shareholders' meeting next Tuesday, the support of the $1.7 trillion fund, Nike's ninth-biggest shareholder, is a significant boost to the proposal that says Nike lags peers.
Adidas and Puma, for instance, have signed the Pakistan Accord, a legally binding agreement between brands and trade unions.
Nike has recommended investors vote against the proposal put forward by Domini Impact Equity Fund.
The sportswear giant, struggling with sliding sales, is under pressure from investors on several fronts, with shareholders also set to vote on two proposals on its supply chain policies and one about its climate targets.
Domini was among more than 60 investors who last year wrote a joint letter to Nike urging it to pay $2.2 million in allegedly unpaid wages to more than 4,000 garment workers at two suppliers in Cambodia and Thailand.
Labour rights groups said the workers lost wages after COVID-19 factory shutdowns. Nike has denied the allegations.
Norway's wealth fund owns 0.92% of Nike's shares, a stake worth around $1.05 billion as of June 30, according to fund data.
"The board should account for material sustainability risks facing the company, and the broader environmental and social consequences of its operations and products," the fund said.
The fund, which says executive pay has become excessive, especially at U.S. companies, also said it would vote against Nike executives' compensation. It has voted against Nike executive pay every year since 2020.
However, the fund said it would not back a shareholder proposal by Tulipshare asking Nike to assess how effective its supply chain policies are at ensuring workers' rights. Put forward for a second time, the proposal got 11.7% of votes at last year's meeting.
CLIMATE TARGETS
The Norwegian fund said it would support a proposal demanding Nike reassess its sustainability strategy after the company missed climate targets it had set for itself.
The proposal, put forward by Trium Capital, requests Nike to publish within a year an analysis of its failure to meet its self-imposed, now discontinued targets for 2015-2020.
Trium said it was disappointed by Nike's "track record and lack of perseverance".
Proxy advisory firms Glass Lewis and ISS had also recommended shareholders back the proposal, with ISS saying the company missed and restated many of its targets without adequate discussion of how oversight would change in the future.
Reporting by Helen Reid in London and Louise Rasmussen in Copenhagen; Editing by Gwladys Fouche, Barbara Lewis and Ros Russell
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
