Natural gas executives, US officials clash over energy policies
By Georgina McCartney and Marianna Parraga
HOUSTON, Sept 17 (Reuters) -Energy executives and U.S. government officials on Tuesday clashed at an international energy conference over efforts by President Joe Biden's administration to globally advance clean fuels and geopolitical aims.
Top energy executives took to the stage at the GasTech conference in Houston to blast the U.S., saying it lacked a clear policy for achieving its aims or supplying needed power for economic developments such as the rise of artificial intelligence.
“It would appear we do not have a cohesive, collective decision on how policy should be rolled out and also the sustainability of that policy for sustainable energy development," said Lorenzo Simonelli, CEO of Baker Hughes BKR.O.
"AI’s advance will depend not only on the design labs of Silicon Valley, but also on the gas fields of the Permian basin," Chevron CEO Michael Wirth said at the annual conference.
ConocoPhillips COP.N CEO Ryan Lance also said the U.S. has been slow to approve needed energy export projects or address needed permitting improvements.
"We absolutely need permitting reform, and we need more infrastructure," he said.
But Brad Crabtree, an assistant secretary for fossil energy and carbon management at the U.S. Department of Energy, told the audience that the administration's Infrastructure Bill has made billions of dollars available for new energy projects.
The DOE is moving to accelerate project reviews to get funding distributed for hydrogen, carbon storage and other clean energy efforts before the change of administrations in January, he said.
"I'm thrilled by the scope and pace of what we're doing" to reduce carbon emissions, said Crabtree. He added he is "very concerned" about challenges to permitting for hydrogen and carbon storage projects.
The U.S. is collaborating broadly with other nations and energy groups to achieve clean-energy goals and counter rivals, said U.S. State Department official Geoffrey Pyatt.
A second thrust of U.S. energy policy is to "make sure that Russia pays a price on the extraordinary violence that it is inflicting on citizens," pointing to efforts to build an coalition on sanctions.
Peter Clarke, an Exxon senior vice president, said developing nations should not be expected to adopt the same clean-energy strategies as advanced economies.
“There is not a one-size-fits-all for Asia," Clarke said. “We need to be careful with taking policies in developed nations, and expecting developing countries to jump to that.”
Reporting by Georgina McCartney, Marianna Parraga, Sabrina Valle and Curtis Williams; writing by Gary McWilliams; Editing by David Gregorio
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
