Murdoch media galaxy would be better with one sun
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are her own.
By Jennifer Saba
NEW YORK, July 25 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Rupert Murdoch wants to orient his galaxy around one son. A fight has erupted over how power over the media mogul’s empire, which includes Fox FOXA.O and News Corp NWSA.O, will be split among four of Murdoch’s children after his death. For independent shareholders, the question of familial fairness is a sideshow. What matters more is stability and predictability, and for that, one head is better than many.
Murdoch, 93, is trying to change the terms of a family trust in a Nevada court, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, so that his son Lachlan becomes the unchallenged ruler of the family domain. The trust controls 43% of the vote of broadcast and sports company Fox, and 40% of newspaper-owning News Corp, which operates the Wall Street Journal, HarperCollins book publisher and real estate assets.
Upon Murdoch’s death, the trust passes equal voting rights from Murdoch to four of his children including James, who once served as CEO of Fox predecessor Twenty-First Century Fox. But Murdoch wants Lachlan to have “permanent exclusive control” over Fox where he serves as chair and chief executive, according to the New York Times, in part to maintain Fox News’ conservative views and prevent any ensuing battles over political matters.
It’s easy to see why Lachlan’s siblings may not love this idea. But investors in Fox have done well with him at the helm, at least compared to peers. The company’s five-year annualized return to shareholders is 1%, where Warner Bros Discovery WBD.O and Paramount Global PARA.O have produced negative returns. It also beats Comcast CMCSA.O and Walt Disney DIS.N. Shares in News Corp, where Lachlan serves as chair, have done even better with a 16% return.
Conflict and gridlock, meanwhile, are surefire value-incinerators. Consider Paramount, where owner Shari Redstone’s strategic dithering led to the exit of CEO Bob Bakish, four board directors and now a lawsuit from angry shareholders. Discord among the Bancroft media clan, former owners of the Wall Street Journal, enabled Murdoch to wrest control of that paper in 2007.
Conversely, investors often tolerate supreme leaders: look at Meta Platforms META.O, controlled by boss Mark Zuckerberg, whose shares have more than doubled over 5 years. Lachlan’s record isn’t flawless; he stumbled with his ham-handed attempt to merge News Corp and Fox in 2022. But better an unelected emperor than a squabbling committee.
Follow @jennifersaba on X
CONTEXT NEWS
Rupert Murdoch is going to court to amend a family trust that controls 43% of the vote at Fox and 40% of the vote at News Corp, according to the New York Times on July 24.
The trust passes voting control from Murdoch to four of his children upon his death. Murdoch, 93, wants his son Lachlan to remain as chairman and chief executive officer of Fox and to have “permanent exclusive control” over the company, according to the New York Times. Under the current agreement, each of the four trustees will have an equal vote.
Fox and News Corp beat peers on shareholder returns https://reut.rs/46i8gCn
Editing by John Foley, Sharon Lam and Pranav Kiran
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
