XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Morgan & Morgan says lawyer suing over ads has no private right to bring claims



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>UPDATE 1-Morgan & Morgan says lawyer suing over ads has no private right to bring claims</title></head><body>

Updates with comment from plaintiff Jody Shackelford.

By Sara Merken

Aug 29 (Reuters) -Morgan & Morgan said an Arkansas lawyer is barred under federal law and state ethics rules from suing the national plaintiffs' law firm in U.S. court and asked a judge on Wednesday to toss the case.

Orlando, Florida-based Morgan & Morgan sought to dismiss a lawsuit filed last month in Arkansas federal court by personal injury lawyer Jody Shackelford accusing the law firm of unfair and deceptive advertising practices that harm his own business.

Morgan & Morgan said there is no private right of action under the Federal Trade Commission Act, so the court does not have jurisdiction over Shackelford's claim. In addition, the firm said that he lacks a private right of action under Arkansas attorney professional conduct rules, which are enforced by the Arkansas Supreme Court. The firm also denied the alleged violations.

Shackelford accused Morgan & Morgan of running advertisements with "dramatizations" and testimonials from clients in violation of the professional conduct rules.

The Arkansas television ads include disclaimers such as "dramatization" and "actual client," which mislead consumers by falsely suggesting that they comply with the local rules, the complaint said. Shackelford claimed the conduct constituted unfair trade practices under federal law and caused him harm, including loss of clients and unfair competition.

Morgan & Morgan also argued in its Wednesday filing that Shackelford had not sufficiently alleged any injury. The state professional conduct rules are meant to protect consumers of legal services, rather than lawyers from competition, the firm said.

Shackelford said in an email on Thursday that he was "ready to dig in and respond."

Representatives for Morgan & Morgan did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


The case is Shackelford v. Morgan & Morgan Complex Litigation Service PA, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas, No. 3:24-cv-00123-JM

For Shackelford: Pro se

For Morgan & Morgan: Steven Quattlebaum, E.B. Chiles and S. Katie Calvert of Quattlebaum, Grooms & Tull


</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.