Missouri law targeting federal gun curbs is unconstitutional, court rules
By Nate Raymond
Aug 26 (Reuters) -A federal appeals court delivered a victory on Monday to President Joe Biden's administration by ruling that a state law adopted by Republican-led Missouri, which declared several federal gun laws "invalid," was unconstitutional.
A three-judge panel of the St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Missouri's bid to reverse a lower-court judge's decision to bar the state from enforcing a 2021 law called the Second Amendment Preservation Act.
The U.S. Department of Justice sued Missouri in 2022 to block the law, which was signed the prior year by Republican Governor Mike Parson and was named for the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment, which enshrines the right "to keep and bear arms."
The law declared that certain federal regulations governing the sale, taxation and possession of firearms would be deemed by Missouri infringements on the rights of individuals to keep and bear arms under the Second Amendment.
The law threatened state and local officials with fines of up to $50,000 for knowingly enforcing federal gun laws considered by the state legislature to violate the amendment.
The Biden administration has said the law unconstitutionally impeded the government's ability to enforce federal law.
It said the law caused many Missouri state and local law enforcement agencies to stop voluntarily assisting in the enforcement of federal gun laws or providing investigative assistance.
Missouri argued the law was constitutional because the state was allowed to withdraw the authority of state officers to enforce federal law, regardless of its reason for doing so.
But Chief U.S. Circuit Judge Steven Colloton, writing for Monday's panel, said just because the state could withhold assistance to federal law enforcement "does not mean that the State may do so by purporting to invalidate federal law."
The panel included two appointees of Republican presidents, including Colloton, and one Democratic appointee. Both the 8th Circuit and U.S. Supreme Court had previously declined to revive the law while the litigation played out.
"We are reviewing the decision," Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, a Republican, said in a statement. "I will always fight for Missourians' Second Amendment rights."
The Justice Department declined to comment.
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Rod Nickel
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
