Mattel buyout would be fun but dangerous plaything
The author is a Reuters Breakingviews columnist. The opinions expressed are his own.
By Jeffrey Goldfarb
NEW YORK, July 23 (Reuters Breakingviews) -Mattel MAT.O holds promise as an enriching private equity plaything. Despite the buzz from last summer’s blockbuster "Barbie" movie, the toymaker behind the famous fashion doll finds itself vulnerable to an enterprising suitor. The math is straightforward enough, but there’s also a decent chance that the U.S. government will call time on the game.
The company behind Fisher-Price and Hot Wheels has suffered a steady decline in its valuation multiple, as some brands like American Girl struggle and investors worry about boss Ynon Kreiz’s strategy of chasing more box-office success. There’s now a notable gap with rival Hasbro HAS.O, but the discount also provides plausible rationale for a takeover. L Catterton, a buyout shop backed by luxury goods giant LVMH LVMH.PA, has approached Mattel with an offer, according to a Reuters report that sparked a 15% rise in the company’s shares on Monday.
Making a deal stack up is child’s play. If the suitor offers a 30% premium to Mattel’s undisturbed stock price on Friday, it would take $8.5 billion to buy the enterprise. Lenders might supply 5 times the $980 million of EBITDA that analysts expect the company to generate this year, according to estimates gathered by LSEG, leaving $3.5 billion to fund with equity. Assume it costs 9% to borrow and that a new owner can boost revenue by 3% annually while improving profitability to match Hasbro’s current 24% EBITDA margin over five years.
If so, selling at the same nearly 9 times multiple of EBITDA implied by an acquisition would reap almost $13 billion, according to Breakingviews calculations. On that basis, a buyer would more than triple its money for an annualized internal rate of return of about 26%.
Other figures are less entertaining. For one thing, Mattel looks big enough to be a choking hazard for L Catterton. The whole firm manages only about $35 billion and generally pursues smaller investments, spreading $2.1 billion across 17 consumer businesses last year. It suggests a need for financial partners, which have a way of making things messier.
Moreover, although Mattel is closing a plant in China, about half its products are still manufactured there. Donald Trump, the frontrunner in the U.S. presidential race, has said he would impose a blanket 60% tariff on all Chinese goods. Such levies would make it harder to sufficiently juice revenue and profit, and make Mattel a much riskier roll of the dice.
Follow @jgfarb on X
CONTEXT NEWS
L Catterton, a private equity firm backed by luxury goods giant LVMH, has approached toymaker Mattel with an acquisition offer, Reuters reported on July 22, citing unnamed sources.
Mattel's valuation multiple diverges with Hasbro's https://reut.rs/4bX6rvA
Editing by Jonathan Guilford and Pranav Kiran
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
