XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Lock maker Assa Abloy resolves US court clash over industry probe



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Lock maker Assa Abloy resolves US court clash over industry probe</title></head><body>

By Mike Scarcella

July 26 (Reuters) -Global lock maker Assa Abloy ASSAb.ST has resolved a dispute over the power of a court-appointed monitor to police its settlement with the U.S. Justice Department stemming from the company's $4.3 billion acquisition of a Spectrum Brands SPB.N unit last year.

Assa Abloy had clashed for weeks in court papers with the corporate monitor supervising its compliance with the settlement, which resolved government antitrust claims. In a filing in Washington, D.C. federal court on Thursday, they said they reached an agreement on the scope of the monitor's work on an industry study about smart locks that Assa Abloy had contested.

Some U.S. settlements include court-approved monitorships to supervise and investigate a company's compliance.

Assa Abloy had accused the monitor, Hausfeld’s Melinda Coolidge, of overstepping her authority by embarking an overly broad review of competition in the smart lock industry.

The company withheld payment from Coolidge, drawing a rebuke from the Justice Department that the company was violating the terms of the settlement.

Assa Abloy, Coolidge and a Justice Department spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Friday.

U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes canceled a hearing in the case that was scheduled for Friday and said she “appreciates the parties working through the issues.”

Assa Abloy said in a court filing this month that the company had paid the monitor a discounted amount — $2.7 million — to cover outstanding invoices.

The antitrust settlement with the DOJ came last year in the government’s lawsuit seeking to block Assa Abloy’s purchase of assets from U.S.-based Spectrum. The deal, which did not include an admission of wrongdoing, came in the middle of a trial.


The case is United States v. Assa Abloy and Spectrum Brands, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 1:22-cv-02791-ACR.

For U.S.: Matthew Huppert and Miranda Isaacs of the Justice Department

For Assa Abloy: Justin Bernick and Lauren Battaglia of Hogan Lovells


Read more:

Lock maker Assa Abloy violating antitrust settlement, US Justice Dept says




Reporting by Mike Scarcella

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.