Kansas' top court rejects ban on common abortion procedure
By Brendan Pierson
July 5 (Reuters) -Kansas' highest court on Friday permanently barred the state from enforcing a law banning the most common second-trimester abortion procedure, saying the ban violated the right to abortion under the state constitution that the court had recognized in 2019.
The 5-1 ruling from the Kansas Supreme Court, with one of the seven justices not participating, leaves in place a lower court order blocking the law, which banned a procedure known as dilation and extraction with a narrow exception for medical emergencies.
The law was challenged shortly after it was passed in 2015 by a group of abortion providers who argued that the state constitution guaranteed a right to abortion. The Kansas Supreme Court's 2019 ruling agreed with the providers that there was such a right and upheld a preliminary order in their favor, but sent the case back to the lower court to be litigated more fully.
The state appealed to the Supreme Court again after the lower court issued a final ruling for the providers.
"We stand by our conclusion that ... the Kansas Constitution Bill of Rights protects a fundamental right to personal autonomy, which includes a pregnant person's right to terminate a pregnancy," Justice Eric Rosen wrote for the majority on Friday.
Justice Caleb Stegall dissented. The conservative judge, who had also dissented from the 2019 ruling, said the constitution's plain text and original meaning did not include a right to abortion.
Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which represented the plaintiffs, called the ruling "an immense victory for the health, safety and dignity of people in Kansas and the entire Midwestern region, where millions have been cut off from abortion access."
"The decision is as disappointing as it is unsurprising," Kansas Attorney General Kris Kobach, a Republican whose office defended the law, said in a statement. "When the word liberty was included in the constitution, no one thought they were creating a right to an abortion."
Abortion is legal in Kansas up to 22 weeks. Kansas voters in August 2022 rejected a measure to remove abortion rights from the state constitution.
The vote came after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned its landmark Roe v. Wade precedent, which had established a right to abortion nationwide, allowing many Republican-led states to ban or restrict abortion and triggering a wave of litigation.
Kansas has become a destination for women seeking abortions in nearby states that have banned it, including Texas, Oklahoma and Missouri.
Reporting By Brendan Pierson in New York, Editing by Alexia Garamfalvi and Rod Nickel
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
