Judge trims First Citizens claims that HSBC poached Silicon Valley Bank workers
By Daniel Wiessner
July 10 (Reuters) -A federal judge in California has dismissed most of First Citizens BancShares' FCNCA.O $1 billion lawsuit accusing HSBC HSBA.L of poaching more than 40 employees of Silicon Valley Bank after its high-profile collapse.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler in San Francisco late Tuesday said that she lacked the ability to hear some of the claims by First Citizens, which acquired Silicon Valley Bank when it failed last year, because they alleged conduct that occurred outside California.
Beeler also tossed claims against several HSBC entities and former Silicon Valley Bank employees who joined HSBC, saying First Citizens had not shown an illegal conspiracy to poach workers and trade secrets.
"Right now, the allegations against most defendants show only a failed bank and employees decamping to a better business opportunity," Beeler wrote.
An HSBC spokesperson in a statement said the bank was pleased with the ruling.
"HSBC is strongly committed to the innovation banking space and to our employees, and will continue to vigorously defend against the lawsuit brought by First Citizens," the spokesperson said.
A representative of First Citizens did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Beeler is scheduled to hold a conference in August to discuss the next steps in the case.
The U.S. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation took over Silicon Valley Bank in March 2023 after a bank run in which depositors rushed to pull out their money, causing the largest bank failure since the 2008 financial crisis.
First Citizens then purchased the failed bank's assets and deposits, and HSBC separately acquired the lender's UK arm.
First Citizens claims in its lawsuit that David Sabow, who led Silicon Valley Bank's technology and healthcare banking segment before moving to HSBC, met with top HSBC executives numerous times and shared plans to poach workers in order to launch a competing venture capital business.
HSBC has denied wrongdoing and said Sabow's efforts to recruit from Silicon Valley Bank, which had about 8,500 employees when it collapsed, were legitimate and predated First Citizens' takeover.
Beeler on Tuesday mostly sided with HSBC, but allowed three claims against Sabow for alleged trade secrets theft and breach of contract to move forward. The judge also left the door open for First Citizens to establish jurisdiction over HSBC's UK arm, where Sabow is employed.
Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York; Editing by Alexandra Hudson
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
