Judge pauses Wyoming oil and gas drilling leases pending review
By Nate Raymond
July 17 (Reuters) -A federal judge has ordered the U.S. Bureau of Land Management to pause approving new permits to drill for oil and gas on nearly 120,000 acres of federal land in Wyoming until it finishes reevaluating the environmental impacts of a lease sale.
Tuesday's decision by U.S. District Judge Christopher Cooper in Washington, D.C., followed his Marchruling finding BLMdid not comply with the National Environmental Policy Act when it decided to auction the land for oil and gas development in 2022.
Siding with conservation groups, Cooperin that ruling saidBLM failed to comply with the law when assessing the impacts of future drilling and did not adequately explain how it considered potential climate harms from greenhouse gas emissions produced by drilling.
Cooper had not ordered any remedies to address those deficiencies in his March ruling. Conservation groups including the Wilderness Society urged him tofully vacate BLM's decision and the leases resulting from the sale.
But Cooper said that while no drilling had yet occurred on any of the leased land, cancelling the lease sale would have "real-world repercussions," forcing a refund of $13 million in sale proceeds and jeopardizing time and effort developers spent gearing up for permitting and drilling.
"In light of the 'serious possibility' that the Bureau will be able to substantiate its prior conclusions and the disruptive effects of setting aside the existing leases, the Court finds that vacatur is not the appropriate remedy in this case," Cooper wrote.
The judge, an appointee of Democratic former President Barack Obama, instead sought to preserve the status quo by enjoining the approval of drilling permits. He gave BLM 180 days to complete its new environmental analysis.
BLM and lawyers for the conservation groups did not respond to requests for comment on Wednesday.
The lawsuit had been filed to challenge a lease sale that was set in motion by a 2021 court order by a federal judge in Louisiana who blocked President Joe Biden's administration from pausing drilling auctions to assess climate impacts.
The case is Wilderness Society v. U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, Case No. 1:22-cv-01871.
For the environmental groups: Alexandra Schluntz and Seth Johnson of Earthjustice
For BLM: Luther Hajek of the U.S. Department of Justice
For Wyoming: Shannon Leininger and Travis Jordan of the Wyoming Attorney General's Office
Read more:
Environmental ruling threatens Wyoming oil and gas drilling leases
U.S. judge orders resumption in federal drilling auctions in setback for Biden
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
