XM does not provide services to residents of the United States of America.

Intel shareholders sue chipmaker after job, dividend cuts cause stock plunge



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>UPDATE 1-Intel shareholders sue chipmaker after job, dividend cuts cause stock plunge</title></head><body>

New throughout, adds Intel comment, accusations in lawsuit, financial details and plans, case citation, byline

By Jonathan Stempel

Aug 7 (Reuters) -IntelINTC.O was sued on Wednesday byshareholders who said the Silicon Valley chipmaker fraudulentlyconcealed problems that led it to post weak results, slash jobs and suspend its dividend, and caused its market value to sink more than $32 billion in a single day.

The proposed class action against Intel, Chief Executive Patrick Gelsinger and Chief Financial Officer David Zinsner was filed in San Francisco federal court.

Shareholders said they were blindsided when Intel revealed on Aug. 1 that its so-called foundry business for making chips on contract for outsiders was in their words "floundering," costing billions of dollars extra even as revenue declined.

They said the Santa Clara, California-based company's materially false or misleading statements regarding the business and its manufacturing capabilities inflated its stock price from Jan. 25 to Aug. 1.

Intel had no immediate comment.

The lawsuit came after Intel said last Thursday it wouldlay off more than 15% of its workforce, or more than 15,000 jobs, and suspend its dividend starting in the fourth quarter as part of a restructuring meant to save $10 billion in 2025.

Intel also posted a $1.61 billion second-quarternet loss, as revenue fell 1% to $12.83 billion.

The company has struggled to fend off competition from rival chipmakers and benefit from growth in artificial intelligence.

Among its rivals are Advanced Micro Devices AMD.O, Nvidia NVDA.O>, Samsung Electronics 005930.KS and Taiwan's TSMC 2330.TW.

Intel's share price tumbled 26% to $21.48 on Aug. 2, the day after it announced quarterly results, the job cuts and the dividend suspension.

The shares closed Wednesday down 3.6% at $18.99 and have fallen 34.6% since the announcement.

The case is Construction Laborers Pension Trust of Greater St. Louis v Intel Corp, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 24-04807.



Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Chris Reese and David Gregorio

</body></html>

Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.

All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.

Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.

Risk Warning: Your capital is at risk. Leveraged products may not be suitable for everyone. Please consider our Risk Disclosure.