In battle over proxy rules, appeals court rules in US SEC's favor
By Douglas Gillison
Sept 10 (Reuters) -In a split decision, a federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled in favor of Wall Street's top regulator, finding the agency was within its rights to rescind parts of Trump-era regulations on proxy advisers.
The ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit marked a defeat for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Business Roundtable and Tennessee Chamber of Commerce & Industry, which had brought suit in 2022.
The legal battle underscored the long-standing tensions between corporations and proxy advisers, who help guide investor voting decisions in corporate elections and who companies say have amassed too much power.
An SEC spokesperson said the agency welcomed the news.
"We are still reviewing the decision but the Commission is pleased that the Sixth Circuit confirmed that the Commission's rulemaking was consistent with its legal obligations," the spokesperson said.
However, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce said it was considering its next steps.
"We continue to weigh all legal options to challenge the SEC's illegal rollback" of the proxy rule, a spokesperson said.
In 2022, the SEC rescinded exemptions the administration of former President Donald Trump had adopted to require that proxy firms give companies a first look at the advice they planned to give investors and allow their clients to learn of any response from the companies.
Critics had said the requirements would have undermined the proxy firms' independence and the administration of President Joe Biden prevented them from taking effect.
Writing for the majority on Tuesday, U.S. Circuit Judge Julia Gibbons upheld an April 2023 lower court decision which found that in rescinding the requirements the SEC had acted within the limits of the law on administrative procedure.
The agency had given its reasons for the policy reversal and the "thoughtful and thorough explanation of these considerations was hardly arbitrary and capricious," she wrote.
In a dissent, U.S. Circuit Judge John Bush said that to the contrary the SEC was legally required to allow more time for public comment and had "failed to adequately estimate the costs and benefits of its dramatic policy shift."
Representatives for the Business Roundtable and Tennessee Chamber of Commerce and Industry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Reporting by Douglas Gillison; Editing by Stephen Coates
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
