Hunter Biden tries to toss criminal cases using Trump special counsel ruling
Adds quote from court filing, background on cases in paragraph 4, 7-13
WASHINGTON, July 18 (Reuters) -U.S. President Joe Biden's son, Hunter Biden, moved on Thursday to throw out his criminal conviction on gun charges and dismiss a separate case accusing him of tax evasion based on an argument that the special counsel prosecuting him was unlawfully appointed.
Biden's lawyers cited a federal judge's decision on Monday todismiss the criminal case accusing former President Donald Trump of illegally retaining classified documents after leaving office.
Florida-based U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon found the appointment of the special counsel in that case, Jack Smith, violated the U.S. Constitution because Congress had not given him the authority to pursue the case. Smith's office is appealing .
"The Attorney General relied upon the exact same authority to appoint the Special Counsel in both the Trump and Biden matters, and both appointments are invalid for the same reason," Biden's lawyers argued in a court filing.
A different special counsel, David Weiss, secured Hunter Biden's conviction last month in Delaware federal court on charges he lied about his illegal drug use to buy a gun.
Weiss is also leading a tax case against Biden that is scheduled to go to trial in September. Biden has pleaded not guilty in that case.
A spokesperson for Weiss did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The move by Biden shows the potential ripple effects from Cannon's decision to limit the attorney general's ability to appoint a special counsel to handle politically sensitive investigations, a practice the U.S. Justice Department has used for decades.
It also presents the awkward dynamic of the president's son relying on a ruling benefiting Trump, his father's Republican opponent in the Nov. 5 presidential election.
Biden is likely to have a more difficult time challenging the special counsel because Cannon's ruling focused on the fact that Smith was not in the U.S. government when appointed and had not been confirmed for the role by the Senate.
Before being named special counsel, Weiss was confirmed by the Senate to serve as the top federal prosecutor in Biden's home state of Delaware during the Trump administration.
Biden previously challenged the appointment of Weiss on different grounds, efforts that were rejected by federal judges in both cases against him.
Another defendant charged as part of Weiss' investigation, Alexander Smirnov, moved to invalidate the special counsel after the ruling in Trump's case. Smirnov has pleaded not guilty to charges that he lied to the FBI when he claimed knowledge of a bribe to Joe Biden.
Reporting by Andrew Goudsward, editing by Deepa Babington
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
