Hong Kong democrats brace for landmark verdict after lengthy legal battle
By Jessie Pang and James Pomfret
HONG KONG, May 29 (Reuters) -Hong Kong's High Court is set hand down a verdict this week against 16 democrats in a landmark subversion trial that critics say could have major repercussions for the city's opposition democratic movement and the global financial hub's reputation.
The verdict comes more than three years after police arrested 47 democrats in mass dawn raids at homes across Hong Kong, later charging them with "conspiracy to commit subversion" under a China-imposed national security law.
The criminal trial is the biggest ever against Hong Kong's democratic opposition and is being closely watched internationally, with diplomats from the U.S., Britain and Europe having attended court proceedings.
So far, 31 of the 47 democrats have pleaded guilty, while 16 maintain their innocence. Four defendants have become prosecution witnesses.
Mass pro-democracy protests erupted in Hong Kong in 2019 over new laws planned by Beijing, which democrats argued infringed on freedoms guaranteed when Hong Kong was handed back to China by the British in 1997.
Known as the 47 democrats case, the charges centre around an unofficial primary election in July 2020 that prosecutors called a "vicious plot" to paralyse government.
The democrats maintain it was an unofficial attempt to select the strongest candidates for a citywide election in a bid to win a historic majority in the legislature.
High Court Judges Alex Lee, Andrew Chan and Johnny Chan are expected to deliver their verdict during hearings scheduled for Thursday and Friday, according to the judiciary website.
Most of the accused have been detained for more than 1,000 days since Feb. 28, 2021, and were subjected to marathon bail hearings.
Countries including the U.S. have criticised the trial as politically motivated, and have called for the accused to be immediately released.
Beijing says the national security laws have brought stability to Hong Kong after months-long, sometimes violent pro-democracy protests in 2019 and that human rights are respected.
Should the democrats be convicted, jail terms will range from a minimum three years for participants, to life imprisonment for "principal" offenders.
Those who have pleaded guilty include former law scholar Benny Tai, whom the prosecution called a "mastermind" of the "conspiracy", and activist Joshua Wong. They will be sentenced after the trial.
The legal saga, regardless of the outcome, has marginalised Hong Kong's once lively democratic opposition that had strived for decades to pressure Beijing to allow full democracy.
"Although he (Leung) might not be well emotionally, and still not yet adapted to prison life ... he always told me that he's innocent," Chan Po-ying, the wife of Leung Kwok-hung, the oldest defendant at 68, told Reuters.
Among what critics say wasa number of key departures from the city's common law tradition, the trial was refused a jury by the Secretary of Justice Paul Lam, citing "involvement of foreign elements". Only 13 of the 47 democrats were granted bail.
Trevor Beel, a lawyer representing activist Gwyneth Ho, 33, argued the democrats had not considered what they were doing was unlawful.
"Everything was conducted openly for the simple reason that no one believed what they were doing was illegal," Beel said.
Lee Yue-Shun, another defendant and former member of the now disbanded pro-democracy party, the Civic Party, wrote on his Facebook that serving people as a social worker while on bail had empowered him, but the upcoming verdict still weighed heavily.
"It's likeusing one hand to cover my own wounds, and using another hand to continue to support others."
Reporting by Jessie Pang and James Pomfret; Editing by Lincoln Feast.
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
