Five questions ratings firms have for a new UK government
By Marc Jones
LONDON, July 4 (Reuters) -With Britain poised to vote for its first change of government in 14 years on Thursday, the firms that slashed its credit score after Brexit, and cut it again when Liz Truss roiled markets in 2022, say they have a list of questions that need answers.
1/STABILISE OR SLIP?
The UK's stretched finances are "the elephant in the room" in this election given the UK's near 100% debt-to-GDP ratio, S&P Global says.
All parties are promising to mend crumbling public services and invest in infrastructure without hiking key taxes. But the market panic when then-Prime Minister Liz Truss vowed to spend big in 2022 is a clear warning against being too radical.
"We are interested in the balance between revenue and expenditure adjustments, which will enable them (new government) to improve the underlying fiscal position," S&P's Frank Gill explained.
With a relatively modest 1.3 percentage point of GDP primary budget deficit likely this year, the UK isn't as far away from a debt-stabilizing balance as G7 peers the U.S., France and Italy are at least.
"But still, there are questions about the composition of consolidation over the next few years... We try to take a view on the sustainability of the fiscal mix. What's really achievable and what's not," said Gill.
2/ HOW MUCH ECONOMIC GROWTH?
Fitch raised its AA- UK rating outlook to "stable" in March, bringing it in line with Moody's but still a grade lower than S&P's AA score.
Its "cautious" projections assumed "a balancing of policy priorities against reducing risks to the sustainability of public finances", noting how the UK's debt-to-GDP number was more than double the 48% of GDP median for 'AA' bracket countries.
Stagnant economic growth, averaging just 1.6% a year over the last decade, will need to pick up considerably, however, to prevent the rating slipping back.
Achieving that won't be easy given the headwinds of net migration as well as labour market participation and productivity growth issues.
3/ RULES BRITANNIA
There is also the question of whether changes will be made to the UK's self-imposed fiscal rules, which require public sector debt to fall as a share of GDP over a five-year period.
Some top Labour officials have suggested serious reforms are off the table for now, given markets are sensitive.
The 2024-25 financial year is set to be the second-highest for government debt issuance on record at 278 billion pounds ($350 billion) though, and the interest bill on Britain's debt alone was a staggering 111 billion pounds last year, roughly 4.4% of GDP.
What is reassuring is that the 10-year gilt yield GB10YT=RR, which is a proxy for the UK government's borrowing costs, is down from last year's highs at just over 4.1%.
4/ RESERVE CURRENCY STATUS
European-based rating firm, Scope, wants to know what will be done to ensure the pound retains is coveted global reserve currency status that helps the UK sell its debt, especially as alternatives such as China's yuan rise up.
"Is there anything that might be done to ensure sterling’s current strong place within the global monetary system?," said Scope's Dennis Shen.
He added "a stable government managing credible budgetary policies" was the best way do it, "as might enhancing access to the (EU) Single Market," pointing to the hard job of healing post-Brexit scars.
5/ RENATIONALISATIONS?
Relentless amounts of raw sewage pouring into the UK's rivers and seas from privatised water companies have been a hot election topic with parties vowing to take action.
Investors are already bailing out of big water firms such as Thames, worried about being on the hook for the huge amounts of money that needs to be spent to solve that problem.
If they don't stump up though, the likes of Thames could go under in their current form, some in the industry have warned.
That would mean the government would need to step in and run them, which would be both complex and costly and add to the UK's debt.
"If that has to be funded, it would be reflected in their (UK's) fiscal assessment," Gill said. "Will it be enough to change the UK rating? I would doubt it, because it's really a confluence of factors," which would lead to that.
The UK's borrowing needs have soared and will stay high https://reut.rs/4cFJjma
UK public sector debt at almost 100% of GDP https://tmsnrt.rs/3rvcUNv
UK election opinion polls UK election opinion polls https://reut.rs/3XCIXsi
Interest spending forecasts have been volatile https://reut.rs/4ePlkmo
Reporting by Marc Jones; editing by Dhara Ranasinghe and William Maclean
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
