First Republic ex-employees' lawsuit against US FDIC is dismissed
By Jonathan Stempel
July 12 (Reuters) -A federal judge in California dismissed a lawsuit accusing the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) of improperly blocking nearly 170 former employees of the failed First Republic Bank from accessing at least $150 million of retirement funds.
U.S. District Judge Haywood Gilliam ruled on Friday that a federal law enacted after the 1980s savings and loan crisis gave the FDIC broad authority to act as receiver for failed banks, and prevented him from getting involved.
Lawyers for the former employees did not immediately respond to requests for comment. An FDIC spokesman declined to comment.
First Republic failed on May 1, 2023, after a series of Federal Reserve interest rate increases caused large losses in its investment portfolio and led many depositors to move their money elsewhere.
The San Francisco-based bank had catered to wealthy customers. Its $229 billion of assets made the collapse the largest U.S. bank failure since the 2008 financial crisis.
JPMorgan Chase JPM.N acquired First Republic's deposits and nearly all its assets.
In their complaint filed last December, the former First Republic employees alleged that the FDIC had on May 18, 2023, wrongfully stopped making payments under their deferred compensation plan.
They said this made them unsecured creditors who would likely recover "little, if anything" even as depositors were protected, and sought to recover what they said they were owed.
But the Oakland, California-based judge said granting that request would interfere with the FDIC's statutory powers. Gilliam dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, meaning it cannot be brought again. The judge said the law "forecloses actions - like this one - which seek to 'restrain or affect' the FDIC in fulfilling its receivership duties."
JPMorgan was not a party to the case. First Republic failed less than two months after the failures of two other lenders, Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.
The case is Harrington et al v FDIC, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 23-06296.
Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Will Dunham
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
