Dartmouth College basketball team's union files complaint over school's refusal to bargain
Union filed complaint with NLRB against Dartmouth for refusing to bargain
Dartmouth argues athletes are students, not employees
College athletes are seeking more autonomy and revenue access
By Liya Cui
Aug 22 (Reuters) -The union representing the Dartmouth College men's basketball team has filed an unfair labor practice complaint against the Ivy League school for refusing to bargain with the players, who in March became the first U.S. college athletes to unionize.
The Service Employees International Union Local 560, which represents other workers at Dartmouth, filed the complaint with the National Labor Relations Board on Tuesday. Calls to a phone number listed for the union's representative in the complaint file on the NLRB's website were not answered.
“For nearly 60 years, Dartmouth has followed a tradition of bargaining fair and equitable union contracts with our local,” the college's student newspaper, the Dartmouth, quoted union President Chris Peck as saying on Wednesday. “It is past time for Dartmouth administration to avoid the looming financial and legal liabilities by grasping this opportunity to show leadership.”
Members of the basketball team voted 13-2 to unionize on March 5 after NLRB Regional Director Laura Sacks ruled that the players were employees of the prestigious school in Hanover, New Hampshire. Later that month, Dartmouth declined to enter a collective bargaining agreement with the players.
"We maintain that the regional director made an extraordinary mistake," said Dartmouth in a statement. "Varsity athletes in the Ivy League are not employees; they are students whose educational program includes athletics."
College athletes have been seeking more autonomy and access to the revenue their games generate for a multibillion-dollar sports industry, which is mostly funneled to schools and their coaches.
In 2021, the National Collegiate Athletic Association allowed student athletes to sell the rights to their name, image and likeness, opening the path to sponsorship and endorsement deals.
Dartmouth has asked the NLRB for a full board review of Sacks' decision and plans to appeal the unfair labor practice charge.
"It is an unprecedented step in Dartmouth’s long history of labor negotiations, but it is the only lever we can engage to ensure this matter is reviewed by a federal court," the school said.
Reporting by Liya Cui in New York; Editing by Matthew Lewis
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
