Competitive dynamics in focus as US tries to stop Tapestry-Capri merger
Adds details from opening statement and witness testimony in paragraphs 4-11
By Siddharth Cavale
NEW YORK, Sept 9 (Reuters) -The U.S. Federal Trade Commission urgeda federal judge in New York to block Tapestry's TPR.N $8.5 billion merger with rival handbag maker Capri Holdings CPRI.N at a trial on Monday, arguing it will eliminate fierce competition in the market for "accessible luxury."
The FTC argues the merger announced in August 2023 would eliminate head-to-head competition between Tapestry's Coach and Kate Spade brands and Capri's Michael Kors' brands, which has resulted in better prices, discounts and promotions for consumers and wages and workplace benefits for employees.
The deal would also give Tapestry a dominant share of the "accessible luxury" handbag market, controlling over 50% of it once the deal is completed. The regulator defined the "accessible luxury" market as handbags sold between $100 and below $1,000, which forms most of Coach and Kors' lines.
FTC Chief Trial Counsel Nicole Lindquist told U.S. District Judge Jennifer Rochon in a packed courtroom that the brunt of a merger would be borne by "the working and middle class women of America."
In its questioning of Capri CEO John Idol, the FTC showed evidence of emails between Idol and his deputies, including Jaryn Bloom, president of North America retail for Capri's Michael Kors brand, asking how Coach's outlets were keeping prices down.
"Look at these prices!" Idol wrote in the emails, urging his deputies to come up with better designs and solutions to compete against Coach. In another email produced by the FTC, Idol asks to talk to a deputy about the design of a Coach handbag.
"They monitor and react to each other's every move," said Lindquist, the FTC lawyer.
Tapestry, in response, argues that the U.S. handbag market is highly fragmented and competitive with low barriers to entry and fickle consumer tastes. It also said FTC's analysis misunderstands the handbag marketplace and the way consumers shop and that "accessible luxury" is a notional concept.
Tapestry lawyer Lawrence Buterman said the FTC's argument is divorced from the commercial reality of the handbag market where customers are inundated with choice.
"The commercial reality is that customers have a Gucci bag lined up next to a Kors bag, lined up next to a Calvin Klein bag," he said.
A lawyer for Capri later told the court that Kors had been losing relevance with shoppers since it peaked in 2016 and that growing competition drove the average price for a Kors handbag to $92, below the FTC's threshold of accessible luxury.
The FTC has sued to block several mergers over the past year, making for a busy schedule.
The antitrust regulator is currently fighting to block supermarket chain Kroger's KR.N acquisition of Albertsons ACI.N in a federal court in Portland, Oregon and has also sued to block the $4 billion acquisition of Mattress Firm by mattress manufacturer Tempur Sealy International TPX.N.
Monday's trial is expected to last for a week and a half.
The trial follows the merger's approval by antitrust regulators in Japan and the European Union earlier this year.
Reporting by Siddharth Cavale in New York; editing by Diane Craft and Chizu Nomiyama
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
