Capital One customers sue to block $35 billion Discover merger
Adds comment from Capital One in paragraph 5
By Mike Scarcella
July 23 (Reuters) -Banking giant Capital One and credit card issuer Discover Financial DFS.N have been hit with a lawsuit claiming their proposed $35 billion merger would reduce competition, drive up prices and should be stopped.
The proposed class action, filed on Monday in Alexandria, Virginia federal court by two Capital One customers in Vermont and New Jersey, said the deal would violate U.S. antitrust law. The merger would create the biggest U.S. credit card issuer by balance and sixth-largest U.S. bank by assets.
Capital One and Discover announced their merger plan in February, swiftly drawing calls by some members of Congress for U.S. regulators to block the deal and raising the prospect of months-long antitrust scrutiny.
The two companies have defended their proposal, saying it would drive competition in markets for credit cards and for payment processing.
Capital One in a statement said it was common for consumers to file lawsuits over proposed mergers and that the case in Virginia "has no merit."
Discover did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday. Attorneys for the plaintiffs declined to comment.
The U.S. Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission have not taken any formal action to oppose the merger. They declined on Tuesday to comment on the proposed class action, which marked the first private lawsuit over the deal.
Discover and American Express both issue credit cards and run their own payment processing systems. Visa and Mastercard operate the country’s largest card payment networks, but neither issues cards.
The lawsuit said the existence of Discover and American Express puts pressure on rivals to pay out rewards to customers to stay competitive.
But after the merger, according to the lawsuit, “this competitive force will greatly diminish.”
Capital One said in a March regulatory filing that its deal would not harm card competition because the combined entity would still only account for about 13% of credit card purchasing volume.
The lawsuit asked the court to either prevent the merger or to require steps such as divesting assets to cure any anticompetitive effects.
Last week, the Federal Reserve and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency held a public meeting addressing the Capital One acquisition plan.
The case is Tyler Baker and Lora Grodnick v. Capital One Financial and Discover Financial Services, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, No. 1:24-cv-01265.
For plaintiffs: Brian Dunne and Yavar Bathaee of Bathaee Dunne
For defendants: No appearances yet
Read more:
Capital One, community groups square off in public meeting on Discover deal
Capital One's $35 billion Discover deal hinges on playing consumer champion
Capital One to buy Discover Financial in $35.3 billion all-stock deal
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
