Canada agrees to probe of lawmakers who allegedly worked for other nations
Releads with government move paragraphs 1, 3, quotes from government minister and opposition paragraphs 6-9, adds details of report paragraph 10, background paragraph 12
By David Ljunggren
OTTAWA, June 10 (Reuters) -The Canadian government, under pressure to reveal the names of legislators who allegedly acted as agents for other nations, on Monday bowed to opposition demands to refer the matter to a special inquiry.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has been on the defensive since a committee of parliamentarians that focuses on security matters last week said some elected officials had been "witting or semi-witting" participants in foreign interference operations, including divulging secrets to other countries.
The Liberal government says naming legislators would break the law, adding it would be up to police to investigate.
The committee, which was citing sensitive information from Canada's secret services, said it could not identify the legislators or the political party to which they belonged.
Opposition legislators on Monday started debating a motion that proposes the matter be turned over to an independent inquiry that is already looking into foreign interference.
Public Safety Minister Dominic LeBlanc said he agreed with the proposal, given that the inquiry already had access to the documents cited by the committee of legislators.
"We think that's a responsible way to proceed, not simply standing up and illegally announcing a list of names," he told the House of Commons elected lower chamber. He did not commit to naming names.
The official opposition Conservatives, who polls show are set for an easy win in a national election that must be held by late October 2025, accuse Trudeau of taking a lax approach to security.
"Certain members of this House acted in the best interest of hostile foreign regimes interfering in Canada's democracy. This is a disgusting betrayal of Canadians who elected us," party legislator Jasraj Singh Hallan told the House on Monday.
In their report last week, the committee of parliamentarians said India and China were the main foreign threats to Canada's democratic institutions.
The independent inquiry, in an interim report, last month announced it had found evidence of foreign interference in Canada's last two federal elections but said the results of the votes were not affected and the electoral system was robust.
Canada's main spy agency last month said persistent Chinese election meddling had the potential to undermine Canadian democracy. Beijing routinely denies accusations of interference.
Reporting by David Ljunggren
Editing by Bill Berkrot and Rod Nickel
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
