BASF to pay $316 million to settle PFAS 'forever chemicals' US lawsuit
Adds details, context throughout
By Clark Mindock
May 21 (Reuters) -German chemical company BASF BASFn.DE said on Tuesday it reached a $316.5 million settlement with some U.S. public water systems that claimed toxic “forever chemicals” in firefighting foam made by the company contaminated their water supplies.
The money provided by the settlement, which must be approved by a federal judge, will help cities, towns and other public water systems remediate contamination of perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS.
PFAS are a class of chemicals used in thousands of consumer and commercial products, including firefighting foams, non-stick pans and stain-resistant fabrics. They have been tied to cancers and other diseases, and are often called forever chemicals because they do not easily break down in nature or the human body.
BASF said in a statement that the settlement does not constitute an admission of liability or wrongdoing, and that it will seek to recover for the settlement through its numerous insurance policies.
The company said it will pay about $4 million as part of the settlement in July, and will pay another $312.5 million in March.
BASF is among nearly two dozen chemical companies that have faced lawsuits brought by water systems over PFAS pollution in sprawling litigation that has been centralized in a South Carolina federal court.
The lawsuits focus on PFAS that contaminated groundwater after being sprayed in firefighting foams at fire houses and airports across the U.S.
In 2023, those lawsuits led to more than $11 billion in settlements between U.S. water systems and major chemical companies including 3M MMM.N, Chemours CC.N, Corteva CTVA.N and DuPont de Nemours DD.N. In April, Johnson Controls JCI.N unit Tyco Fire Products agreed to a $750 million settlement.
BASF and roughly half a dozen other companies had been tentatively scheduled to go to trial in early 2025.
“This significant agreement is in large part the result of the pressure of upcoming trial cases,” attorneys for the water systems at the law firms Douglas & London, Napoli Shkolnik, Baron & Budd and Motley Rice said in a joint statement on Tuesday.
“It acknowledges the scope of the PFAS crisis, and the financial depths required to address a problem of this magnitude," they said.
Beyond the courtroom, PFAS have come under increased regulatory scrutiny in the United States in recent years as well.
In April, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency set the first national drinking water standards to protect people from the chemicals, and designated a pair of the chemicals as hazardous substances under the nation's Superfund program.
Reporting by Clark Mindock in New York; Editing by Bill Berkrot
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
