Australia's Qantas told to pay $114,000 to 3 sacked workers in landmark outsourcing case
Airline illegally cut 1,700 ground handling jobs in 2020 during pandemic
Total damages bill will include all workers, not just the three test cases
Airline working to recover reputation under new CEO
By Byron Kaye
SYDNEY, Oct 21 (Reuters) -A court on Monday ordered Australia's Qantas Airways QAN.AX to pay a combined A$170,000 ($114,000) to three baggage handlers it unlawfully sacked in 2020, implying a big damages bill for a lawsuit involving about 1,700 former workers whose jobs were outsourced.
Federal Court Judge Michael Lee said Qantas must pay each of the fired workers A$30,000, A$40,000 and A$100,000 respectively for non-economic loss to reflect the "harm sustained" when the airline laid off them and their colleagues to prevent industrial action.
The carrier must use those payouts as "test cases" as it negotiates with a union on a total damages bill for all of the former ground workers. Qantas had claimed the sackings were warranted as a cost-cutting measure during the COVID-19 pandemic and fought the industrial lawsuit all the way to the High Court.
Lee said he found if Qantas had not illegally outsourced its ground handling operations in 2020, it would have done so lawfully in 2021 to help save about A$100 million a year.
Though the ruling did not give a final payout figure, it sets the tone for the last major legal battle for the airline as it tries to recover from a reputational horror stretch in relation to its actions during and immediately after pandemic restrictions from 2020 to 2022.
The airline said it May it would pay A$120 million to settle a regulator lawsuit accusing it of selling tickets on already cancelled flights in the months after Australia's international border reopened. It was also accused of pressuring the federal government to stop rival Qatar Airways from offering more flights to Australia.
"Qantas says it's turned over a new leaf," said Michael Kaine, national secretary of the Transport Workers Union that brought the industrial dismissal case.
"It's time to prove it. After relentlessly prolonging this case and denying workers justice, Qantas must do everything in its power to ensure appropriate compensation."
Qantas CEO Vanessa Hudson, who started in the role in November 2023, said in a statement the company apologised to the workers impacted by its decision "and we know that the onus is on Qantas to learn from this".
Lee, the judge, told Qantas and the TWU to discuss compensation for all the sacked workers and return to court on Nov. 15.
($1 = 1.4916 Australian dollars)
Reporting by Byron Kaye; Editing by Jamie Freed
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
