Australia should force Meta to pay for news, News Corp executive says
Adds Meta comment in paragraphs 6 and 15-16
CANBERRA, June 5 (Reuters) -Australia should force Meta Platforms META.O to pay news companies for content that appears on Facebook and impose broader regulation on social media firms, a senior News Corp NWSA.O executive said.
Meta said in March it would stop paying Australian news publishers for content. The government is now considering whether to apply a 2021 law that would force it to do so.
"Meta must be designated under the Media Bargaining Code and challenged to negotiate in good faith," News Corp Australia executive chairman Michael Miller said in a speech in Canberra, using the jargon of the 2021 legislation.
"We had a deal - and they walked away. I believe they have an obligation to renew the agreements, and honour our laws," he said.
"We can't let ourselves be bullied."
Asked for comment, Meta referred Reuters to a company blog post that said interest in news was declining on its platforms and cast those platforms as free distribution channels that media companies could use to expand their audiences.
Publishers argue that Facebook and other internet giants profit unfairly from advertising revenue when links to news articles appear on their platforms.
Meta struck payment deals with Australian media firms in 2021, most of which lapse this year.
If the government tries toenforce the 2021 law, Meta could block users from reposting news articles as it did briefly in Australia in 2021 and has done since 2023 in Canada, which has similar laws and where academics have noted an increased spread of misinformation as a result.
Meta has been reducing its promotion of news and political content to drive traffic and has said it will discontinue a tab on Facebook promoting news in Australia.
In his speech, Miller also decried the impact of social media on mental health and its amplification of scams and social ills such as misogyny.
He proposed a regulatory framework for tech firms such as Meta, Tik Tok and X, formerly known as Twitter, that he said would protect Australians.
This would include making companies liable for all content on their platforms, competition laws for digital advertising, better handling of consumer complaints and donations to mental health programmes.
Companies that do not abide by these rules should be barred from the Australian market, he said.
A spokesperson for Meta said: "The suggestion that Meta doesn't respect Australian laws or community standards is preposterous."
The company has restricted access to content in line with Australian laws, worked with law enforcement to prevent real world harm and trained thousands of young Australians in online safety, they said.
Reporting by Peter Hobson: Editing by Neil Fullick
Related Assets
Latest News
Disclaimer: The XM Group entities provide execution-only service and access to our Online Trading Facility, permitting a person to view and/or use the content available on or via the website, is not intended to change or expand on this, nor does it change or expand on this. Such access and use are always subject to: (i) Terms and Conditions; (ii) Risk Warnings; and (iii) Full Disclaimer. Such content is therefore provided as no more than general information. Particularly, please be aware that the contents of our Online Trading Facility are neither a solicitation, nor an offer to enter any transactions on the financial markets. Trading on any financial market involves a significant level of risk to your capital.
All material published on our Online Trading Facility is intended for educational/informational purposes only, and does not contain – nor should it be considered as containing – financial, investment tax or trading advice and recommendations; or a record of our trading prices; or an offer of, or solicitation for, a transaction in any financial instruments; or unsolicited financial promotions to you.
Any third-party content, as well as content prepared by XM, such as: opinions, news, research, analyses, prices and other information or links to third-party sites contained on this website are provided on an “as-is” basis, as general market commentary, and do not constitute investment advice. To the extent that any content is construed as investment research, you must note and accept that the content was not intended to and has not been prepared in accordance with legal requirements designed to promote the independence of investment research and as such, it would be considered as marketing communication under the relevant laws and regulations. Please ensure that you have read and understood our Notification on Non-Independent Investment. Research and Risk Warning concerning the foregoing information, which can be accessed here.
