Retail, consumer CEOs see shorter tenures as boards act more quickly
By Svea Herbst-Bayliss and Richa Naidu
NEW YORK/LONDON, Sept 10 (Reuters) -When two of the most powerful brands in retail and packaged foods last month ousted their CEOs, it signaled corporate boards are more ready to toss top executives before activist investors tell them to act.
The tenure for U.S. retail and packaged goods company CEOs has this year on average been about 7 months shorter than chiefs who were in office in 2024 in the autos, finance, tech and manufacturing industries, data to August 31 from executive compensation research firm Equilar show.
And now, their time in the top job may be shrinking as consumers buying iced lattes, chocolate bars and detergent become pickier, leaving companies with less time to innovate and demonstrate performance. At the same time, corporate directors are quicker to act, bankers, lawyers and academics say, forcing CEOs to deliver quickly or face an abrupt exit.
"There is a fresh lack of patience at the board level," said Jim Rossman, global head of shareholder advisory at Barclays BARC.L. "With the COVID-19 pandemic behind us and some stronger economic data, there is plenty to judge a CEO's management abilities by and if they aren't performing they are out."
Monday marked the first day on the job for Starbucks SBUX.O chief Brian Niccol who replaces Laxman Narasimhan after the board gave him only 16 months on the job. Nestle's Mark Schneider had only 24 hours to digest his firing in the face of a sagging share price after eight years as CEO.
While activist Elliott Investment Management was pushing for a board seat at Starbucks, the board fired the CEO without the hedge fund's input, sources familiar with the events said. At Nestle, which has faced activist pressure before when Third Point pushed for changes, the board again acted without public pressure from a hedge fund.
Consumer packaged goods and retail chiefs to August 31 have held the top job for 7.7 years on average, according to Equilar, which tracks Russell 3000 companies.
This compares with other big industries like finance CEOs who had their jobs 10 years on average, and tech CEOs who lasted nearly 9 years on average, Equilar data shows.
"There is a huge amount of pressure on consumer goods CEOs," said Richard Sumner, managing partner of the Consumer Markets Practice for Europe and Africa at executive search firm Heidrick & Struggles. He pointed to increased activism from investors and CEOs being forced to drive innovation in the face of challenged margins and sales performance.
'ROCKY ROAD'
In 2023, Alan Jope, the former CEO of Unilever ULVR.L, the London-based maker of Dove soap, was out after less than five years as the company tried to offload its ice cream brands. Activist investment firm Trian Fund Management which has a seat on Unilever's board, endorsed Jope's successor.
Miguel Patricio led Kraft Heinz KHC.O for 4-1/2 years until late 2023 and while he remains a board member, the company said its change in leadership reflected thoughtful succession planning with an eye to growth.
Nicandro Durante exited Reckitt Benckiser RKT.L in 2023 after less than two years as CEO. His replacement, Kris Licht, was credited with engineering a turnaround in the company's health business.
"It's been a rocky road in consumer goods the last few years," Heidrick & Struggles' Sumner added. "The impact of Covid across the consumer products space has meant that sales spikes have gone up and down."
Shorter CEO tenures can also be partly explained by executives being worn out. Keeping up with consumer tastes as inflation surged has made the job much tougher, executive head-hunters, bankers and lawyers said.
But the speed with which some chiefs were terminated may point to a new trend: corporate boards are acting before outsiders publicly force them to.
Board members "worry about what the stock did during their tenure on the board and are ready to act more quickly to make sure that they preserve their desirability as a director," Barclay's Rossman said.
Even so, many boards are sticking with their executives even in the face of pressure from hedge funds, bankers said, but several said that the pace of calls to discuss questions like executive changes suggest greater nervousness.
Nestle and Starbucks share prices dropped this year -- more than 8% for Nestle and nearly 20% for Starbucks as the company struggled with sales in the United States and China. They recovered as CEOs were replaced, with Starbucks surging 25%, marking the biggest single day gain since going public.
As the pace of investor activism at corporations has picked up this year with shareholders pushing for changes at a record number of companies globally in the first half, corporate boards are under pressure.
Fixing a business or selling it often takes time and with impatient investors at the door, the fastest way to signal action is underway is by axing a top executive,bankers, lawyers and academics said.
"Repairing operational problems can't be done overnight," said Georgetown University professor Jason Schloetzer, an expert in corporate governance. "But what you can do more quickly is remove a board member or an executive. Heads rolling is meant to signify that change is coming."
US retail CEOs stay in office shorter than counterparts in finance, tech https://reut.rs/4e4B4B6
Reporting by Svea Herbst-Bayliss and Richa Naidu with additional reporting by Abigail Summerville. Editing by Vanessa O'Connell and Anna Driver
Ativos relacionados
Últimas notícias
Isenção de Responsabilidade: As entidades do XM Group proporcionam serviço de apenas-execução e acesso à nossa plataforma online de negociação, permitindo a visualização e/ou uso do conteúdo disponível no website ou através deste, o que não se destina a alterar ou a expandir o supracitado. Tal acesso e uso estão sempre sujeitos a: (i) Termos e Condições; (ii) Avisos de Risco; e (iii) Termos de Responsabilidade. Este, é desta forma, fornecido como informação generalizada. Particularmente, por favor esteja ciente que os conteúdos da nossa plataforma online de negociação não constituem solicitação ou oferta para iniciar qualquer transação nos mercados financeiros. Negociar em qualquer mercado financeiro envolve um nível de risco significativo de perda do capital.
Todo o material publicado na nossa plataforma de negociação online tem apenas objetivos educacionais/informativos e não contém — e não deve ser considerado conter — conselhos e recomendações financeiras, de negociação ou fiscalidade de investimentos, registo de preços de negociação, oferta e solicitação de transação em qualquer instrumento financeiro ou promoção financeira não solicitada direcionadas a si.
Qual conteúdo obtido por uma terceira parte, assim como o conteúdo preparado pela XM, tais como, opiniões, pesquisa, análises, preços, outra informação ou links para websites de terceiras partes contidos neste website são prestados "no estado em que se encontram", como um comentário de mercado generalizado e não constitui conselho de investimento. Na medida em que qualquer conteúdo é construído como pesquisa de investimento, deve considerar e aceitar que este não tem como objetivo e nem foi preparado de acordo com os requisitos legais concebidos para promover a independência da pesquisa de investimento, desta forma, deve ser considerado material de marketing sob as leis e regulações relevantes. Por favor, certifique-se que leu e compreendeu a nossa Notificação sobre Pesquisa de Investimento não-independente e o Aviso de Risco, relativos à informação supracitada, os quais podem ser acedidos aqui.
