PVC pipe maker JM Eagle sues US asbestos law firm in racketeering case
Adds comment from Simmons Hanly managing partner in paragraph 4
By David Thomas
May 13 (Reuters) -Plastic pipe maker JM Eagle has sued a U.S. law firm that filed hundreds of asbestos personal injury cases against it, marking the latest counterstrike by a defendant against the asbestos plaintiffs bar.
JM Eagle's lawsuit, filed Friday in Chicago federal court under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, alleged that law firm Simmons Hanly Conroy suppressed evidence, used perjured or falsified testimony and statements, and committed fraud in the course of recovering billions of dollars from asbestos defendants in thousands of cases.
"These untrue statements have caused J-M Manufacturing to incur vast sums of litigation fees and expenses defending against claims brought by the firm," the lawsuit said. JM Eagle, which calls itself the world's largest plastic and PVC pipe manufacturer, was previously known as J-M Manufacturing.
Simmons Hanly is based in Alton, Illinois, and specializes in asbestos-related mesothelioma claims. The firm's managing partner, Laurence Nassif, said in a statement that JM Eagle's claims are "baseless" and that the company is trying to avoid "accountability for its dangerous practices and the harm it has caused innocent people."
Ashwin Ram, a partner at Steptoe who is representing JM Eagle, said in a statement his client has "taken the first step to hold Simmons Hanly accountable for the misconduct that it has uncovered."
Simmons Hanly has filed more than 430 cases against JM Eagle since 2001, according to the lawsuit. JM Eagle said it has settled more than 75 of the cases, but would have reduced the settlement amounts or not paid if it knew some of those lawsuits contained "falsehoods peddled by Simmons Hanly."
In what JM Eagle described as a "a quintessential RICO enterprise," Simmons Hanly allegedly orchestrated sham claims based on "often fabricated" evidence of asbestos injury from discontinued products, including cement pipe made by JM Eagle before a switch to plastic piping.
JM Eagle noted that it is not the first company to level fraud or racketeering claims against asbestos personal injury law firms, citing prior cases involving defendants CSX Transportation, Garlock Sealing Technologies and John Crane Inc.
Gasket maker Garlock, for example, sued four law firms in 2014, alleging that plaintiffs' lawyers concealed evidence and induced clients to commit perjury to drive up asbestos-related settlements and garner bigger fees. Garlock ultimately settled with those law firms.
JM Eagle is seeking an unspecified amount of damages. In addition to its federal racketeering claim, its lawsuit alleges unjust enrichment, fraud and civil conspiracy.
The case is J-M Manufacturing Co Inc v. Simmons Hanly Conroy LLP, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, No. 24-cv-03853.
For J-M Manufacturing: Ashwin Ram, John Byron, Andrew Adams of Steptoe; and Frank Fletcher of J-M Manufacturing
For Simmons Hanly Conroy: Not yet available
Reporting by David Thomas
Ativos relacionados
Últimas notícias
Isenção de Responsabilidade: As entidades do XM Group proporcionam serviço de apenas-execução e acesso à nossa plataforma online de negociação, permitindo a visualização e/ou uso do conteúdo disponível no website ou através deste, o que não se destina a alterar ou a expandir o supracitado. Tal acesso e uso estão sempre sujeitos a: (i) Termos e Condições; (ii) Avisos de Risco; e (iii) Termos de Responsabilidade. Este, é desta forma, fornecido como informação generalizada. Particularmente, por favor esteja ciente que os conteúdos da nossa plataforma online de negociação não constituem solicitação ou oferta para iniciar qualquer transação nos mercados financeiros. Negociar em qualquer mercado financeiro envolve um nível de risco significativo de perda do capital.
Todo o material publicado na nossa plataforma de negociação online tem apenas objetivos educacionais/informativos e não contém — e não deve ser considerado conter — conselhos e recomendações financeiras, de negociação ou fiscalidade de investimentos, registo de preços de negociação, oferta e solicitação de transação em qualquer instrumento financeiro ou promoção financeira não solicitada direcionadas a si.
Qual conteúdo obtido por uma terceira parte, assim como o conteúdo preparado pela XM, tais como, opiniões, pesquisa, análises, preços, outra informação ou links para websites de terceiras partes contidos neste website são prestados "no estado em que se encontram", como um comentário de mercado generalizado e não constitui conselho de investimento. Na medida em que qualquer conteúdo é construído como pesquisa de investimento, deve considerar e aceitar que este não tem como objetivo e nem foi preparado de acordo com os requisitos legais concebidos para promover a independência da pesquisa de investimento, desta forma, deve ser considerado material de marketing sob as leis e regulações relevantes. Por favor, certifique-se que leu e compreendeu a nossa Notificação sobre Pesquisa de Investimento não-independente e o Aviso de Risco, relativos à informação supracitada, os quais podem ser acedidos aqui.
