Lawsuit claims NY workplace bias laws don't apply to airlines
By Daniel Wiessner
Aug 1 (Reuters) -A trade group representing major U.S. airlines has sued a New York state civil rights agency accusing it of improperly trying to use state anti-discrimination laws to eliminate airlines' limits on paid sick leave for employees.
The lawsuit filed in Brooklyn federal court on Wednesday is at least the fourth by Airlines for America to claim that states are improperly requiring airlines to provide paid leave for routine doctor's appointments and "transitory" medical conditions.
A federal judge in Boston last year agreed with the group that a Massachusetts paid sick leave law was preempted by a federal law regulating airlines. The group also has lawsuits pending against Colorado and Illinois.
Wednesday's lawsuit was prompted by an administrative complaint that the New York Division of Human Rights filed last November claiming American Airlines discriminates against flight attendants based on disability and sex by disciplining them for missing work over certain medical issues, including for routine pregnancy-related appointments.
Airlines for America says a state anti-bias law does not cover those kinds of absences and that even if it did, the law is preempted by the federal Airline Deregulation Act, which bars states from adopting laws that affect the "price, route, or service" offered by an air carrier.
Finding otherwise would lead to an increase in worker absences, which in turn would cause flight delays, cancellations, and longer lines at ticket counters and gates, the lawsuit says.
Airlines for America has ten members including American, Delta Air Lines, JetBlue Airways, Southwest Airlines, United Airlines, FedEx and UPS.
The Division of Human Rights did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Thursday.
In the Massachusetts case, U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs last year found that a state law mandating paid sick leave had triggered an increase in sick days taken by airline employees. She also said that "sick leave abuse" was common in the airline industry, pointing to a spike in absences on weekends and holidays.
Airlines for America in Wednesday's lawsuit says the New York Division of Human Rights is similarly interfering with airlines' ability to use attendance policies common in the industry in which workers receive points for absences and can be disciplined or fired if they accumulate too many.
The lawsuit seeks a declaration that New York law, as interpreted by the Division of Human Rights, is preempted by the federal airline law.
The case is Airlines for America v. Miranda, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York, No. 1:24-cv-05387.
For Airlines for America: Mark Robertson and Charles Mahoney of O'Melveny & Myers
For the state: Not available
Read more:
Judge sends airlines’ challenge to Mass. sick leave law to trial
Reporting by Daniel Wiessner in Albany, New York
Ativos relacionados
Últimas notícias
Isenção de Responsabilidade: As entidades do XM Group proporcionam serviço de apenas-execução e acesso à nossa plataforma online de negociação, permitindo a visualização e/ou uso do conteúdo disponível no website ou através deste, o que não se destina a alterar ou a expandir o supracitado. Tal acesso e uso estão sempre sujeitos a: (i) Termos e Condições; (ii) Avisos de Risco; e (iii) Termos de Responsabilidade. Este, é desta forma, fornecido como informação generalizada. Particularmente, por favor esteja ciente que os conteúdos da nossa plataforma online de negociação não constituem solicitação ou oferta para iniciar qualquer transação nos mercados financeiros. Negociar em qualquer mercado financeiro envolve um nível de risco significativo de perda do capital.
Todo o material publicado na nossa plataforma de negociação online tem apenas objetivos educacionais/informativos e não contém — e não deve ser considerado conter — conselhos e recomendações financeiras, de negociação ou fiscalidade de investimentos, registo de preços de negociação, oferta e solicitação de transação em qualquer instrumento financeiro ou promoção financeira não solicitada direcionadas a si.
Qual conteúdo obtido por uma terceira parte, assim como o conteúdo preparado pela XM, tais como, opiniões, pesquisa, análises, preços, outra informação ou links para websites de terceiras partes contidos neste website são prestados "no estado em que se encontram", como um comentário de mercado generalizado e não constitui conselho de investimento. Na medida em que qualquer conteúdo é construído como pesquisa de investimento, deve considerar e aceitar que este não tem como objetivo e nem foi preparado de acordo com os requisitos legais concebidos para promover a independência da pesquisa de investimento, desta forma, deve ser considerado material de marketing sob as leis e regulações relevantes. Por favor, certifique-se que leu e compreendeu a nossa Notificação sobre Pesquisa de Investimento não-independente e o Aviso de Risco, relativos à informação supracitada, os quais podem ser acedidos aqui.
