Judge won't block Mississippi law on discounts for hospitals' contract pharmacies
By Brendan Pierson
July 1 (Reuters) -A federal judge in Mississippi on Monday refused to block a Mississippi law requiring drugmakers to offer discounts on drugs dispensed by third-party pharmacies that contract with hospitals and clinics serving low-income populations.
U.S. District Judge Halil Ozerden in Gulfport, Mississippi, denied motions for preliminary orders blocking the law in separate lawsuits by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), the nation's leading drug industry group, and by Novartis NOVN.S.
The lawsuits are among several challenging similar state laws, with others pending in Maryland and West Virginia. There have not been rulings in the other cases.
Ozerden ruled that PhRMA and Novartis were unlikely to prevail in their argument that the state law conflicts with the federal law governing the so-called 340B program, which requires drugmakers to offer discounts to hospitals and clinics that serve low-income patients as a condition of receiving funds from government health insurance programs like Medicare and Medicaid.
"If anything, (the law) arguably promotes Section 340B's objective of ensuring covered-entity patients can conveniently access their medications," the judge wrote in both decisions.
Novartis said in a statement that it disagreed with the decision and planned to appeal.
PhRMA and a spokesperson for Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Many providers eligible for the 340B program contract with outside pharmacies to dispense prescription drugs, so that they do not have to maintain in-house pharmacies. In 2010, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issued new guidance stating that 340B providers could use an unlimited number of these so-called contract pharmacies, replacing previous guidance that they could use only one such pharmacy.
Drugmakers have argued for years that the widespread use of contract pharmacies in the 340B program leads to a lack of transparency and makes it more likely that some drugs are discounted when they should not be, or that duplicate discounts are applied to the same drug.
In 2020, many began imposing restrictions on 340B drug sales using contract pharmacies. Novartis said it would only deal with contract pharmacies located within 40 miles of a 340B provider, and other companies imposed other kinds of restrictions.
Drug companies previously prevailed in court against federal guidance that would have required drugmakers to do business with contract pharmacies under the 340B program. Following those court victories for the drug industry, Maryland, West Virginia, Mississippi, Kansas and Louisiana passed laws requiring drugmakers to offer 340B discounts on drugs dispensed by contract pharmacies.
The cases are Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America v. Fitch, No. 1:24-cv-00160, and Novartis v. Fitch, No. 1:24-cv-00164, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi.
For PhRMA: Abid Qureshi of Latham & Watkins
For Novartis: Cate Stetson of Hogan Lovells
For the state: Special Assistant Attorney General Rex Shannon
Read more:
Lawsuits pile up over state laws on discounts for hospitals' contract pharmacies
Drugmakers prevail in dispute over U.S. discount drug program
(Reporting By Brendan Pierson in New York)
</body></html>Ativos relacionados
Últimas notícias
Isenção de Responsabilidade: As entidades do XM Group proporcionam serviço de apenas-execução e acesso à nossa plataforma online de negociação, permitindo a visualização e/ou uso do conteúdo disponível no website ou através deste, o que não se destina a alterar ou a expandir o supracitado. Tal acesso e uso estão sempre sujeitos a: (i) Termos e Condições; (ii) Avisos de Risco; e (iii) Termos de Responsabilidade. Este, é desta forma, fornecido como informação generalizada. Particularmente, por favor esteja ciente que os conteúdos da nossa plataforma online de negociação não constituem solicitação ou oferta para iniciar qualquer transação nos mercados financeiros. Negociar em qualquer mercado financeiro envolve um nível de risco significativo de perda do capital.
Todo o material publicado na nossa plataforma de negociação online tem apenas objetivos educacionais/informativos e não contém — e não deve ser considerado conter — conselhos e recomendações financeiras, de negociação ou fiscalidade de investimentos, registo de preços de negociação, oferta e solicitação de transação em qualquer instrumento financeiro ou promoção financeira não solicitada direcionadas a si.
Qual conteúdo obtido por uma terceira parte, assim como o conteúdo preparado pela XM, tais como, opiniões, pesquisa, análises, preços, outra informação ou links para websites de terceiras partes contidos neste website são prestados "no estado em que se encontram", como um comentário de mercado generalizado e não constitui conselho de investimento. Na medida em que qualquer conteúdo é construído como pesquisa de investimento, deve considerar e aceitar que este não tem como objetivo e nem foi preparado de acordo com os requisitos legais concebidos para promover a independência da pesquisa de investimento, desta forma, deve ser considerado material de marketing sob as leis e regulações relevantes. Por favor, certifique-se que leu e compreendeu a nossa Notificação sobre Pesquisa de Investimento não-independente e o Aviso de Risco, relativos à informação supracitada, os quais podem ser acedidos aqui.
