A XM não fornece serviços a residentes nos Estados Unidos da América.

Japan firms see Harris presidency as better for business than Trump, Reuters survey shows



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Japan firms see Harris presidency as better for business than Trump, Reuters survey shows</title></head><body>

By Kiyoshi Takenaka

TOKYO, Aug 15 (Reuters) -More Japanese companies believe a Kamala Harris presidency in the U.S. would be better for their businesses than a second Donald Trump administration, a Reuters survey showed on Thursday, reflecting the respondents concerns about protectionism and policy unpredictability.

The outcome of November's U.S. presidential election is being closely watched by countries around the world. But Japan is a close ally of Washington, with tens of thousandsof U.S. troops stationed there, and its businesses would feel the impact of a renewed U.S.-China trade war since both are among its top trading partners.

Some 43% of Japanese firms said they preferred Harris in light of their corporate strategies and business plans while 8% picked Trump.

A total of 46% said either candidate would be fine, with the remaining 3% saying they preferred neither.

"There is a possibility that trade war, economic friction and security threats will be brought about under another Trump administration, forcing us to change our business strategy," a manager at a ceramics manufacturer wrote in the survey.

Japan's relations with the Trump administration were at times strained by his demands for more payments towards military assistance and by trade tensions.

With Harris, "we can expect current policies to be maintained by and large. That would give us better visibility into the future," an official at a chemicals firm said.

Asked what change will likely be necessary under a Trump administration, 34% said their foreign exchange strategy would need to be reviewed, while 28% said their supply chains would be realigned and 21% said they would reduce their China operations.

Trump has floated the idea of a 10% universal tariff on U.S. imports, which could disrupt international markets, and a tariff of at least 50% on Chinese goods.

Nikkei Research reached out to 506 companies from July 31 to Aug. 9 on behalf of Reuters for the survey, with 243 firms responding.

CHINA SLOWDOWN

Regardless of who wins the U.S. election, 13% of Japanese companies are considering reducing operations in China, while 3% are looking into expanding their businesses, with 47% planning to maintain their current exposure, the survey showed.

Among those thinking about paring down operations in China, 35% said they saw no prospects for economic recovery, 29% cited tough price competition and another 29% pointed to economic security risks as reasons to cut back.

China's economy grew much slower than expected in the second quarter and its exports rose at their slowest pace in three months in July, adding to concerns about the outlook for its vast manufacturing sector.

Major Japanese companies that have announced cutbacks in their China operations in recent months include Honda Motor 7267.T and Nippon Steel 5401.T.

The survey also showed 24% of respondents saw recent rounds of intervention in the foreign exchange market by Japanese authorities as appropriate, compared with 9% that found the moves inappropriate and 64% that believed they were unavoidable.

The yen kept falling earlier this year despite intervention in April and May, touching a 38-year low of 161.96 to the dollar on July 3. Japanese authorities are suspected to have stepped in again in mid-July to put a floor under the yen.

"The extreme weakness in the yen had to be corrected. It just couldn't be helped," an official at an electronics company said.

Asked if the Bank of Japan should raise interest rates to shore up the yen, 51% said such a step was allowed only when exchange rates fluctuated excessively, while 22% said they didn't support a monetary policy change aimed at affecting the foreign exchange market.

On expectations for the yen, 32% saw it trading in a range of 145 to 150 yen to the dollar at the end of the year, while 25% predicted the Japanese currency to be firmer at 140 to 145 yen, while 22% saw it trading between 150 to 155 yen.

During the period of the survey, the yen was volatile and touched its strongest level since the start of the year before reversing course. It has since continued to weaken.



Reporting by Kiyoshi Takenaka; Editing by David Dolan and Christian Schmollinger

</body></html>

Isenção de Responsabilidade: As entidades do XM Group proporcionam serviço de apenas-execução e acesso à nossa plataforma online de negociação, permitindo a visualização e/ou uso do conteúdo disponível no website ou através deste, o que não se destina a alterar ou a expandir o supracitado. Tal acesso e uso estão sempre sujeitos a: (i) Termos e Condições; (ii) Avisos de Risco; e (iii) Termos de Responsabilidade. Este, é desta forma, fornecido como informação generalizada. Particularmente, por favor esteja ciente que os conteúdos da nossa plataforma online de negociação não constituem solicitação ou oferta para iniciar qualquer transação nos mercados financeiros. Negociar em qualquer mercado financeiro envolve um nível de risco significativo de perda do capital.

Todo o material publicado na nossa plataforma de negociação online tem apenas objetivos educacionais/informativos e não contém — e não deve ser considerado conter — conselhos e recomendações financeiras, de negociação ou fiscalidade de investimentos, registo de preços de negociação, oferta e solicitação de transação em qualquer instrumento financeiro ou promoção financeira não solicitada direcionadas a si.

Qual conteúdo obtido por uma terceira parte, assim como o conteúdo preparado pela XM, tais como, opiniões, pesquisa, análises, preços, outra informação ou links para websites de terceiras partes contidos neste website são prestados "no estado em que se encontram", como um comentário de mercado generalizado e não constitui conselho de investimento. Na medida em que qualquer conteúdo é construído como pesquisa de investimento, deve considerar e aceitar que este não tem como objetivo e nem foi preparado de acordo com os requisitos legais concebidos para promover a independência da pesquisa de investimento, desta forma, deve ser considerado material de marketing sob as leis e regulações relevantes. Por favor, certifique-se que leu e compreendeu a nossa Notificação sobre Pesquisa de Investimento não-independente e o Aviso de Risco, relativos à informação supracitada, os quais podem ser acedidos aqui.

Aviso de risco: O seu capital está em risco. Os produtos alavancados podem não ser adequados para todos. Recomendamos que consulte a nossa Divulgação de Riscos.