EBay seeks judge's guidance to settle with victims of harassment campaign
By Nate Raymond
July 18 (Reuters) -EBay EBAY.O on Thursday sought court guidance to help it settle a lawsuit by a Massachusetts couple who were the victims of a bizarre stalking and harassment campaign carried out by several of its now-former employees after an online newsletter they published drew the ire of top executives.
The request, made by a lawyer for the e-commerce company during a hearing in Boston, came shortly before a different judge sentenced the last of the seven former eBay workers who had pleaded guilty to participating in the cyberstalking scheme.
Brian Gilbert, who served as senior manager of special operations for eBay's global security team and has been diagnosed with terminal cancer, was sentenced to no prison time and a $20,000 fine by U.S. District Judge William Young.
He was one of the seven ex-eBay workers who were charged in 2020 and who all pleaded guilty to participating in a campaign that prosecutors said aimed to silence David and Ina Steiner, whose newsletter EcommerceBytes had been deemed by top executives to be critical of their company.
Other employees have received sentences of as high as 57 months in prison for their roles in an extensive campaign in 2019 that involved sending the Steiners cockroaches, fly larvae and a bloody Halloween pig mask and surveiling their home in Natick, Massachusetts.
San Jose, California-based eBay agreed in January to pay $3 million under a criminal deferred prosecution agreement. But the company and some ex-eBay executives and employees remain defendants in a separate civil lawsuit by the Steiners.
During a hearing before U.S. District Judge Patti Saris, eBay counsel Jack Pirozzolo of Sidley Austin said the company was seeking to settle the lawsuit.
But he said it became clear during a mediation last month that the parties needed guidance from Saris on a key issue if they were to resolve the case: Whether the Steiners are entitled to seek punitive damages.
Under Massachusetts law, the Steiners would not be entitled to seek punitive damages against eBay, but the Steiners' lawyers, led by Andrew Finkelstein of Finkelstein & Partners, contend California law would govern that damages claim.
"Is this the barrier to settlement?” Saris asked.
"I would not say it's the only barrier but I would say that it became a significant issue in settlement discussions,” Pirozzolo said.
The judge asked the parties to propose a schedule to brief the issue so she could address it before an expected trial next year.
The case is Steiner v. eBay Inc, U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts, No. 21-cv-11181.
For the Steiners: Andrew Finkelstein of Finkelstein & Partners
For eBay: Jack Pirozzolo of Sidley Austin
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston
Ativos relacionados
Últimas notícias
Isenção de Responsabilidade: As entidades do XM Group proporcionam serviço de apenas-execução e acesso à nossa plataforma online de negociação, permitindo a visualização e/ou uso do conteúdo disponível no website ou através deste, o que não se destina a alterar ou a expandir o supracitado. Tal acesso e uso estão sempre sujeitos a: (i) Termos e Condições; (ii) Avisos de Risco; e (iii) Termos de Responsabilidade. Este, é desta forma, fornecido como informação generalizada. Particularmente, por favor esteja ciente que os conteúdos da nossa plataforma online de negociação não constituem solicitação ou oferta para iniciar qualquer transação nos mercados financeiros. Negociar em qualquer mercado financeiro envolve um nível de risco significativo de perda do capital.
Todo o material publicado na nossa plataforma de negociação online tem apenas objetivos educacionais/informativos e não contém — e não deve ser considerado conter — conselhos e recomendações financeiras, de negociação ou fiscalidade de investimentos, registo de preços de negociação, oferta e solicitação de transação em qualquer instrumento financeiro ou promoção financeira não solicitada direcionadas a si.
Qual conteúdo obtido por uma terceira parte, assim como o conteúdo preparado pela XM, tais como, opiniões, pesquisa, análises, preços, outra informação ou links para websites de terceiras partes contidos neste website são prestados "no estado em que se encontram", como um comentário de mercado generalizado e não constitui conselho de investimento. Na medida em que qualquer conteúdo é construído como pesquisa de investimento, deve considerar e aceitar que este não tem como objetivo e nem foi preparado de acordo com os requisitos legais concebidos para promover a independência da pesquisa de investimento, desta forma, deve ser considerado material de marketing sob as leis e regulações relevantes. Por favor, certifique-se que leu e compreendeu a nossa Notificação sobre Pesquisa de Investimento não-independente e o Aviso de Risco, relativos à informação supracitada, os quais podem ser acedidos aqui.
