A XM não fornece serviços a residentes nos Estados Unidos da América.

Companies ask US judiciary group to force lawsuit funding disclosures



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>UPDATE 1-Companies ask US judiciary group to force lawsuit funding disclosures</title></head><body>

Adds comment in paragraphs 11, 12 from funding advocate

By Mike Scarcella

Oct 3 (Reuters) -More than 100 major companies from the technology, pharmaceutical, automotive and other sectors have urged the U.S. judiciary to adopt a nationwide rule requiring disclosure of third-party litigation funding in lawsuits.

Companies including Amazon.com, Google, Cisco, Meta, Comcast, Exxon, Zurich, Eli Lilly, Bayer, Ford, Pfizer and Novartis submitted the letter on Wednesday to the federal courts’ Advisory Committee on Civil Rules, in advance of a hearing by the committee next week.

Litigation funding, where a financier backs clients' cases in exchange for a cut of an eventual settlement or judgment, has become a multibillion-dollar industry in recent years.

Some U.S. courts require disclosure of outside funding, but there is no uniformity across the judiciary.

The companies either had no immediate comment or did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the letter, which was organized by defense-focused Lawyers for Civil Justice.

Some of the signatories have previously expressed concern about litigation funding and the need for greater oversight. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business groups have for years called on standardizing funding disclosure rules.

The Chamber's Institute for Legal Reform submitted a letter on Wednesday to the advisory committee urging greater oversight, and Republican U.S. Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis expressed a similar view.

The companies’ letter said disclosures about financial backers in cases are necessary to allow defendants to make informed decisions about the course of litigation. They said outside funding “fundamentally alters the dynamics and has a major impact on whether the dispute can be resolved through settlement.”

Christopher Bogart, chief executive of litigation funder Burford Capital, in a statement on Thursday questioned the motives of the companies that signed onto the letter and rejected their call for mandatory disclosures.

"What they want is to keep their unfair advantage in the justice system and to drive up costs for anyone who sues them – which is exactly what they do whenever they find out about the identity of a litigation funder,” Bogart said.

The International Legal Finance Association, a Washington, D.C. group that advocates for the funding industry, in a statement on Thursday criticized the drive for a nationwide disclosure rule.

"These companies yet again are attempting to further tilt the justice system in their own favor by forcing their challengers to disclose privileged information about their legal strategies," Shannon Campagna, the group's acting executive director, said.

The judiciary's civil rules advisory committee is meeting on Oct. 10 in Washington, D.C. The panel said its agenda includes a discussion of amending court rules to require disclosure of litigation funding. No formal proposal is up for a vote.

A representative for the committee declined to comment.

The committee last discussed litigation funding in late 2021.


Read more:

Louisiana law places new rules on litigation funders

Litigation funder Burford fights order denying bid to take over Sysco cases

US litigation funding in 'state of flux' as deal commitments dip, says report

Litigation funders deployed $3.2 bln in U.S. investments last year - report



Reporting by Mike Scarcella

</body></html>

Isenção de Responsabilidade: As entidades do XM Group proporcionam serviço de apenas-execução e acesso à nossa plataforma online de negociação, permitindo a visualização e/ou uso do conteúdo disponível no website ou através deste, o que não se destina a alterar ou a expandir o supracitado. Tal acesso e uso estão sempre sujeitos a: (i) Termos e Condições; (ii) Avisos de Risco; e (iii) Termos de Responsabilidade. Este, é desta forma, fornecido como informação generalizada. Particularmente, por favor esteja ciente que os conteúdos da nossa plataforma online de negociação não constituem solicitação ou oferta para iniciar qualquer transação nos mercados financeiros. Negociar em qualquer mercado financeiro envolve um nível de risco significativo de perda do capital.

Todo o material publicado na nossa plataforma de negociação online tem apenas objetivos educacionais/informativos e não contém — e não deve ser considerado conter — conselhos e recomendações financeiras, de negociação ou fiscalidade de investimentos, registo de preços de negociação, oferta e solicitação de transação em qualquer instrumento financeiro ou promoção financeira não solicitada direcionadas a si.

Qual conteúdo obtido por uma terceira parte, assim como o conteúdo preparado pela XM, tais como, opiniões, pesquisa, análises, preços, outra informação ou links para websites de terceiras partes contidos neste website são prestados "no estado em que se encontram", como um comentário de mercado generalizado e não constitui conselho de investimento. Na medida em que qualquer conteúdo é construído como pesquisa de investimento, deve considerar e aceitar que este não tem como objetivo e nem foi preparado de acordo com os requisitos legais concebidos para promover a independência da pesquisa de investimento, desta forma, deve ser considerado material de marketing sob as leis e regulações relevantes. Por favor, certifique-se que leu e compreendeu a nossa Notificação sobre Pesquisa de Investimento não-independente e o Aviso de Risco, relativos à informação supracitada, os quais podem ser acedidos aqui.

Aviso de risco: O seu capital está em risco. Os produtos alavancados podem não ser adequados para todos. Recomendamos que consulte a nossa Divulgação de Riscos.