California cities divided on response to homeless encampments
By Liya Cui
July 31 (Reuters) -San Francisco will ramp up sweeps of homeless encampments under a directive issued days after California Governor Gavin Newsom told cities to begin enforcing laws against camping, while Los Angeles said it would effectively ignore the state's order.
Under Mayor London Breed's directive, San Francisco will continue to offer shelter and services for homeless people, but police and city staff will work to prevent small encampments from growing larger and will prevent homeless people from returning to cleared areas, her office said in a statement.
The directive follows a June U.S. Supreme Court decision, powered by its conservative majority, in a case from Oregon that upheld laws used to ticket and fine people living on the streets. That ruling gave cities more authority to enforce laws when people refuse to leave a homeless encampment.
Under San Francisco's new policies, authorities would issue warnings and follow them with citations that could lead to escalating penalties, including arrest.
"The goal is not punishment, it is compliance," according to the city's statement, released late on Tuesday.
A city count from January found that there were more than 8,000 homeless people in San Francisco, with 4,000 shelter beds available.
Breed's crackdown appeared to have begun on Tuesday morning when police, fire department and local officials ordered people to leave a homeless encampment located under the city's Central Freeway, according to the San Francisco Standard news outlet. It reported that homeless people there had no prior notice of the clearance.
San Francisco is one of the first California cities to officially step up enforcement after Newsom issued an executive order last week calling on state agencies to dismantle homeless encampments where they have jurisdiction, while urging local governments to do the same in areas controlled by municipal authorities.
The Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors voted unanimously on Tuesday to stick with its existing policies despite the Democratic governor's directive and mitigate any negative effects that the Supreme Court decision could have on its approach to homelessness. Its resolution did not explicitly mention Newsom's order.
"Leaning on increased criminalization of camping without investing in an adequate supply of interim and permanent housing would be misaligned with the county's framework to end homelessness," Va Lecia Adams Kellum, CEO of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority, told a board meeting.
The board has the support of Los Angeles Sheriff Robert Luna.
"Being homeless is not a crime, and we will maintain our focus on criminal behavior rather than an individual's status," Luna said at the meeting.
Advocates for the homeless have said ticketing and arresting people for sleeping outdoors criminalizes homelessness, and that removing camps without enough alternative shelter or housing would only worsen the situation.
Los Angeles County takes what it calls a "care first, jails last" approach to addressing homelessness that favors expansion of services and treatment to encourage people to leave encampments.
The city of Los Angeles had roughly 45,000 homeless people in 2023, with 16,000 shelter beds, according to the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority. The number of homeless people dropped for the first time in Los Angeles since 2018, according to an official count from January.
US Supreme Court backs anti-camping laws used against homeless people nL1N3IQ0MT
Governor Newsom orders removal of California homeless encampments nL1N3JH0WX
US Supreme Court ruling will worsen homelessness crisis, groups warn nL1N3IQ162
Reporting by Liya Cui in New York; Editing by Will Dunham
Últimas notícias
Isenção de Responsabilidade: As entidades do XM Group proporcionam serviço de apenas-execução e acesso à nossa plataforma online de negociação, permitindo a visualização e/ou uso do conteúdo disponível no website ou através deste, o que não se destina a alterar ou a expandir o supracitado. Tal acesso e uso estão sempre sujeitos a: (i) Termos e Condições; (ii) Avisos de Risco; e (iii) Termos de Responsabilidade. Este, é desta forma, fornecido como informação generalizada. Particularmente, por favor esteja ciente que os conteúdos da nossa plataforma online de negociação não constituem solicitação ou oferta para iniciar qualquer transação nos mercados financeiros. Negociar em qualquer mercado financeiro envolve um nível de risco significativo de perda do capital.
Todo o material publicado na nossa plataforma de negociação online tem apenas objetivos educacionais/informativos e não contém — e não deve ser considerado conter — conselhos e recomendações financeiras, de negociação ou fiscalidade de investimentos, registo de preços de negociação, oferta e solicitação de transação em qualquer instrumento financeiro ou promoção financeira não solicitada direcionadas a si.
Qual conteúdo obtido por uma terceira parte, assim como o conteúdo preparado pela XM, tais como, opiniões, pesquisa, análises, preços, outra informação ou links para websites de terceiras partes contidos neste website são prestados "no estado em que se encontram", como um comentário de mercado generalizado e não constitui conselho de investimento. Na medida em que qualquer conteúdo é construído como pesquisa de investimento, deve considerar e aceitar que este não tem como objetivo e nem foi preparado de acordo com os requisitos legais concebidos para promover a independência da pesquisa de investimento, desta forma, deve ser considerado material de marketing sob as leis e regulações relevantes. Por favor, certifique-se que leu e compreendeu a nossa Notificação sobre Pesquisa de Investimento não-independente e o Aviso de Risco, relativos à informação supracitada, os quais podem ser acedidos aqui.
