XM nie świadczy usług obywatelom Stanów Zjednoczonych.

Sustainable Switch: What a Trump win would mean for clean energy



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>Sustainable Switch: What a Trump win would mean for clean energy</title></head><body>

Sept 3 -By Sharon Kimathi

Energy and ESG Editor, Reuters Digital

sharon.kimathi@thomsonreuters.com


Hello!

Today's newsletter tackles three key questions about the U.S. elections and clean energy: What would a Donald Trump presidency mean for climate and energy policies? What is Joe Biden's energy legacy? And what to expect from Kamala Harris if she becomes president.

It seems Trump would rescind many of President Biden's clean energy rules while also speeding approvals of power plants to meet rising U.S. electricity demand.

One of the most significant rollbacks would be removing the U.S. from the Paris agreement on climate change as Trump did during his 2017-2021 White House term.

But what about Biden's presidency? What is his climate and energy legacy?

U.S. oil and gas production hit the highest levels of any country ever, despite his administration's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, which contains hundreds of billions of dollars in subsidies for clean energy such as wind, solar, hydrogen, geothermal projects.


Axing clean energy laws

Should Trump win the Nov. 5 election, his campaign said he would axe clean energy regulations of Biden and his Democrat opponent, Vice President Kamala Harris, on both power plants and vehicle emissions.

Those rules are aimed at slashing carbon emissions from the power industry while also pushing the auto industry to transition to electric cars to cut tailpipe pollution.

Trump "will immediately stop all Biden-Harris policies that distort energy markets, limit consumer choice and drive up the costs on consumers on day one," David Bernhardt, his former Interior Department secretary, told reporters in a call organized by the campaign.


New power plants

Bernhardt said Trump would also implement rapid approvals for energy projects and "the construction of hundreds of new power plants," without detailing how those would be fueled.

Trump would "modernize" the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to speed approvals for new nuclear plants and for existing ones to have their lives extended, Bernhardt said..

"There's been legislation to address some of these issues, but there's a long way to go".

In April, Biden's Environmental Protection Agency finalized rules targeting carbon, air and water pollution from power plants. These will effectively require coal-fired power plants and new natural gas-fired generators in the coming decade to capture emissions.


Not ban fracking

In response to Trump’s proposed policy rollbacks, James Singer, a Harris campaign spokesperson, said the Republican candidate wants to sell out the country’s energy future to Big Oil executives and that under Biden and Harris, "American energy of all kinds has hit record production levels, resulting in hundreds of thousands of new jobs for American workers because of her leadership."

And what about Harris?

Just last week, the Democratic presidential candidate told CNN that she would not ban fracking if elected president.

"As vice president, I did not ban fracking. As president, I will not ban fracking," Harris said.


Talking Points

  • At least 13 people have died in the Philippines due to tropical storm Yagi, while schools and government offices were closed in Manila and nearby provinces on Tuesday because of expected bad weather.

  • French oil major TotalEnergies has signed a $100 million deal to help preserve U.S. forests. The agreement with partners Anew Climate and Aurora Sustainable Lands calls for the reduction of timber harvesting across 300,000 hectares in 10 states.

    • The number of fires in Brazil's Amazon rainforest region for the month of August surged to the highest level since 2010, government data showed, after a record drought that has been plaguing the biome.

    • Volkswagen is considering closing factories in Germany for the first time, in a move that shows the mounting pressure Europe's top carmaker faces from Asian rivals.

    In Conversation

    Frank Altman, founder of Community Reinvestment Fund, a U.S.-based community development financial institution, shares his thoughts on the anti-environment, social and governance (ESG) movement:

    “Anti-ESG rhetoric is on the rise in the United States, and it is simply wrong.

    “The effort to combat climate change must include investors who want to own stocks in companies that are responding responsibly to the climate challenges we are facing.

    “Industries that are responsible for carbon emissions are fueling this backlash in order to maintain their inclusion in investment funds.

    “A recent article in the San Francisco Chronicle pointed out that most participants in 401(k) and 403(b) retirement plans are forced to invest in carbon-emitting firms as part of indexed funds.

    “Those who seek to ban consideration of ESG factors in investment decisions are simply removing choice from investors.

    “These retirement plans should include options for plan participants to make their own choices regarding ESG investments.

    “The same concept of allowing investors choices applies to companies engaged in the diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) movement.

    “The American population is growing more diverse daily, and it makes good business sense to serve this diverse market. DEI and excellence go hand in hand.”

    ESG Lens

    Last week, I highlighted the green backlash affecting European politics as Germany’s far-right AfD party is trying to pick up rural voters who oppose the growth of wind energy.

    This week, the AfD was a big winner of the German state vote that dealt a heavy blow to the parties in Chancellor Olaf Scholz's government, securing 33.2% in Thuringia in its first regional election, and also gaining almost as many votes as the conservatives in Saxony.

    ESG Spotlight

    Today’s spotlight shines a light on the positive developments after authorities in Brazil cleaned up their waters.

    Sea turtles in the Guanabara Bay of Rio de Janeiro are getting healthier after struggling for years with a tumor disease that ultimately leads to their death.

    Scientists said this came after authorities made an effort to clean up the water of the natural harbor. Research has linked fibropapillomatosis, a benign tumor in sea turtles, to both a virus and environmental factors.

    Think your friend or colleague should know about us? Forward this newsletter to them. They can also subscribe here.


    The far-right AfD did well in two Germany state elections https://reut.rs/4g6zXCx


    Editing by Alexander Smith

    </body></html>

Wyłączenie odpowiedzialności: Każdy z podmiotów należących do XM Group świadczy usługę polegającą wyłącznie na realizacji zleceń i dostępie do naszej internetowej platformy transakcyjnej, umożliwiając danej osobie przeglądanie i/lub korzystanie z treści dostępnych na stronie lub za jej pośrednictwem, co nie ma na celu zmiany lub rozszerzenia tego zakresu, ani nie zmienia i nie rozszerza go. Taki dostęp i korzystanie z niego podlegają w każdej chwili: (i) Warunkom umowy, (ii) Ostrzeżeniom o ryzyku i (iii) Pełnemu wyłączeniu odpowiedzialności. Treści te są zatem podawane wyłącznie jako informacje ogólne. W szczególności należy pamiętać, że treści zawarte na naszej internetowej platformie transakcyjnej nie stanowią oferty ani zaproszenia do zawarcia jakichkolwiek transakcji na rynkach finansowych. Transakcje na każdym rynku finansowym wiążą się ze znacznym poziomem ryzyka dla twojego kapitału.

Wszystkie materiały publikowane na naszej internetowej platformie transakcyjnej są przeznaczone wyłącznie do celów edukacyjnych/informacyjnych i nie zawierają – i nie powinny być uważane za zawierające – porad ani rekomendacji dotyczących finansów, inwestycji, podatków lub transakcji, zapisu naszych cen transakcyjnych, ani też oferty lub zaproszenia do transakcji na jakichkolwiek instrumentach lub niezamówionych promocji finansowych.

Wszelkie treści pochodzące od podmiotów trzecich, jak i treści przygotowane przez XM, takie jak opinie, wiadomości, badania, analizy, ceny i inne informacje lub linki do stron podmiotów trzecich zawarte na tej stronie internetowej są udostępniane na zasadzie „tak, jak jest” jako ogólny komentarz rynkowy i nie stanowią porady inwestycyjnej. W zakresie, w jakim jakakolwiek treść jest interpretowana jako badania inwestycyjne, należy zauważyć i zaakceptować, że treść ta nie była przeznaczona i nie została przygotowana zgodnie z wymogami prawnymi mającymi na celu promowanie niezależności badań inwestycyjnych i jako taka byłaby uważana za komunikat marketingowy w świetle odpowiednich przepisów prawnych i regulacji. Upewnij się, że przeczytałeś(-aś) i rozumiesz nasze dokumenty Powiadomienie o zależnych badaniach inwestycyjnych oraz Ostrzeżenie o ryzyku, dotyczące powyższych informacji, do których można uzyskać dostęp tutaj.

Ostrzeżenie o ryzyku: Twój kapitał jest zagrożony. Produkty z zastosowaniem dźwigni mogą nie być odpowiednie dla każdego inwestora. Zapoznaj się z Ujawnieniem ryzyka.