US judge boycotting Columbia law clerks asked to recuse from protest case
By Nate Raymond
Sept 13 (Reuters) -A federal judge in North Dakota has been asked to recuse himself from a lawsuit pursued by current and former Columbia Law School faculty concerning protests over the Dakota Access oil pipeline after he and 12 other judges said they would boycott hiring law clerks from the school.
U.S. District Judge Daniel Traynor in Bismarck and several other judges appointed by Republican former President Donald Trump in May said they would not hire Columbia graduates as clerks because its New York campus had become an "incubator of bigotry" during pro-Palestinian demonstrations over Israel's war in Gaza.
In a motion on Thursday, lawyers affiliated with Columbia Law School's Initiative for a Just Society argued that the boycott showed Traynor could no longer impartially preside over a case they are pursuing concerning the closure of part of a highway during 2016-2017 protests over the Dakota Access oil pipeline.
"A reasonable observer would harbor doubts about Judge Traynor's impartiality in adjudicating any case represented by Columbia Law School faculty," the lawyers argued.
They said it was "not just any case" either, as it concerned a law enforcement response to protest activities, which the plaintiffs contend was overzealous.
They contrasted those claims with the letter Traynor signed, which called for more severe enforcement against those who participated in the highly-publicized demonstrations on Columbia's campus in the spring.
Traynor did not respond to a request for comment.
The motion to have him recuse himself from the case is one of the first known to have been filed nationally based on the 13 judges' Columbia clerk hiring boycott.
The New Orleans-based 5th Circuit Judicial Council in August dismissed a misconduct complaint against eight of the judges in the boycott, including U.S. Circuit Judge James Ho, by a prisoner who accused them of political bias.
The proposed class action was filed in 2018 by two members of the Standing Rock Sioux tribe and a priest in2020 against various state officials; Morton County, where the tribe's reservation is located; and TigerSwan, a private security company for pipeline developer Energy Transfer Partners.
The lawsuit alleged that a five-month closure of a part of the highway during large-scale protests against the Dakota Access pipeline unduly restricted travel and violated the plaintiffs' free speech and religious rights.
The plaintiffs' pro bono lawyers include Noah Smith-Drelich, a former lecturer at Columbia now at Chicago-Kent College of Law, and Bernard Harcourt, a Columbia professor and founding director of its Initiative for a Just Society.
Traynor has presided over the case since 2020. While he dismissed claims against various state officials last year, the case remains pending against Morton County and TigerSwan, which deny wrongdoing.
The case is Thunderhawk v. County of Morton, North Dakota, et al, U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota, No. 18-cv-00212.
For the plaintiffs: Noah Smith-Drelich of Chicago-Kent College of Law, Amy Knight of Phillips Black and Bernard Harcourt of Columbia Law School
For Morton County: Randall Bakke of Bakke Grinolds Wiederholt
For Tigerswan: Aubrey Zuger of Fredrikson & Byron
Read more:
US judges cleared of misconduct over Columbia clerk hiring boycott
US judiciary to consider new ethical guidance for law clerk hiring
Conservative US judges boycott Columbia grads over campus Gaza protests
Reporting by Nate Raymond in Boston
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.
