US judge throws out consumer lawsuit over Alaska Airlines, Hawaiian merger
Adds comment from consumers' lawyer in paragraph 5
By Mike Scarcella
Aug 13 (Reuters) -A U.S. judge has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to block Alaska Airlines’ plan to buy Hawaiian Airlines for $1.9 billion, a deal the consumer plaintiffs said would cut routes and raise prices.
Chief U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson in Hawaii in a Monday order said the airline passengers who brought the case had not shown they have legal standing to sue over the merger.
“They allege no personal connection to either airline that would plausibly establish a concrete or particularized harm,” Watson wrote in his order dismissing the lawsuit.
Alaska Airlines in a statement said it welcomed the decision, and said the merger will "expand benefits and choice for consumers."
An attorney for the consumers, Joseph Alioto, on Tuesday said they would ask a U.S. appeals court to block the airlines' merger.
The merger, announced last year, still faces U.S. regulatory review by the U.S. Justice Department. A spokesperson for the department did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Last month, Alaska and Hawaiian said they were cooperating with the DOJ probe and had agreed to extend the review period until Aug. 15.
Eight airline passengers from Hawaii, California and other states sued to stop the Alaskan Airlines deal in April,arguing it would violate U.S. antitrust law.
Their lawsuit said “the current trend toward concentration, the lessening of competition and the tendency to create a monopoly in the airlines industry is unmatched, unparalleled, and dangerous.”
Alaska Airlines, the fifth-largest U.S. carrier, countered that the merger would give customers greater access to more travel destinations. It called the plaintiffs “serial litigants” who presented “boilerplate” claims.
Hawaiian Airlines was not a defendant in the lawsuit.
The case is Warren Yoshimoto et al v. Alaska Airlines and Alaska Air Group, U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, No. 1:24-cv-00173.
For plaintiffs: Terence O'Toole of Starn O'Toole Marcus & Fisher; and Joseph Alioto of Alioto Law Firm
For Alaska Air: Courtney Dyer, Stephen McIntyre, Anna Pletcher and Pete Herrick of O’Melveny & Myers
Read more:
Alaska Airlines asks US court to reject lawsuit over Hawaiian merger
US consumers sue to stop Alaska Air, Hawaiian Airlines merger
Reporting by Mike Scarcella
Mga Kaugnay na Asset
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.