UK water companies at risk of claims after Supreme Court sewage ruling
LONDON, July 2 (Reuters) -British water companies are at increased risk of lawsuits over pollution after a landmark ruling from the United Kingdom's Supreme Court on Tuesday, amid public outrage over discharges of raw sewage in Britain.
The Manchester Ship Canal, which owns the Victorian-era canal in northern England, won an appeal that means it can sue United Utilities UU.L over discharges of water contaminated with untreated sewage.
A United Utilities spokesperson said the company was considering the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling, adding that United Utilities had made an early start on a proposed 3 billion pound ($3.80 billion) programme to cut spills by 60% over the decade to 2030.
United Utilities shares were down 1.4% at 1325 GMT.
Water companies, which were privatised under Margaret Thatcher's Conservative government in 1989, have repeatedly dumped raw sewage into Britain's waterways in recent years.
They have prompted public anger, as well as separate lawsuits valued at hundreds of millions of pounds for allegedly overcharging customers following under-reporting of sewage discharges.
United Utilities had twice won in lower courts, which ruled the canal company effectively could not bring a lawsuit for nuisance or trespass unless the polluting discharges were the result of negligence or deliberate wrongdoing.
But the Supreme Court unanimously allowed the Manchester Ship Canal's appeal, potentially opening up other companies to similar litigation.
The court noted in its written ruling: "Discharges of foul water from the outfalls could be avoided if United Utilities invested in improved infrastructure and treatment processes."
A spokesperson for industry body Water UK said water companies are seeking approval from regulator Ofwat to invest 100 billion pounds "to ensure the security of our water supply and end sewage entering our rivers and seas".
An Ofwat spokesperson said the regulator was considering the judgment's implications.
The Good Law Project, a campaign group which supported the Environmental Law Foundation in intervening in the appeal, said the ruling could prompt "a deluge of legal action".
($1 = 0.7897 pounds)
Reporting by Sam Tobin; additional reporting by Yadarisa Shabong; editing by Barbara Lewis
Mga Kaugnay na Asset
Pinakabagong Balita
Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.
Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.
Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.
