Hindi nagbibigay ng serbisyo ang XM sa mga residente ng Estados Unidos.

News Corp would have lost $9 million in 2017 by ditching Google ads, ex-exec testifies



<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><title>REFILE-UPDATE 1-News Corp would have lost $9 million in 2017 by ditching Google ads, ex-exec testifies</title></head><body>

Refiles to fix typographical error in first paragraph

By Jody Godoy

ALEXANDRIA, Virginia, Sept 10 (Reuters) - News Corp in 2017 estimated losing at least $9 million in ad revenue that year if it had switched away from Google's massive advertising apparatus, keeping the media conglomerate captive to the Big Tech company, a former News Corp executive testified on Tuesday.

"I felt like they were holding us hostage," Stephanie Layser said the second day of Google's antitrust trial in Virginia.

Google frustrated publishers by introducing features that benefited itself more than them, said Layser, who worked in advertising technology at News Corp from 2017 to 2022. However, almost no one in the industry used anything else, because Google's publisher ad server is tied to Google's ad exchange, she said.

Thetrial is expected to last several weeks, withthe U.S. Department of Justice seeking to show that Google monopolized markets for publisher ad servers, advertiser ad networks and the ad exchanges that connect the two.

NewsCorp documents shown at trial estimated that in 2016, the publisher made $83.3 million from ads sold instantaneously through ad tech tools. More than half of those transactions went through Google's ad exchange, with $18.4 million from Google ads advertisers.

The publisher estimated that around half of that, or $9 million, was exclusive to Google and would be lost in any shift to another product.

By the time she left, around 70-80% of News Corp ad transactions flowed through Google's ad exchange, Layser said.

Google has said that the case is based on an outdated look at the industry, and that large publishers use an average of six different platforms to sell ads that there are more than 80 such services.

At trial, prosecutors are seeking to show Google used dominant positions in technology for publishers and advertisers to keep them from using other tools and undercut bids placed through competitors' products.

Layser was the second publisher witness to testify at the trial. Tim Wolfe, an advertising executive at Gannett GCI.N, testified on Monday that the company has used Google's publisher ad server for around 13 years, and that there are no other realistic options.

Google adtech competitors such as Trade Desk TTD.O, Comcast CMCSA.O and PubMatic PUBM.O are on the list of potential witnesses, as are more than two dozen current or former Google employees and executives.

If U.S. District Judge Leonie Brinkema finds that Google broke the law, she would consider prosecutors' request to make Google at least sell off Google Ad Manager, a platform that includes the company's publisher ad server and its ad exchange.



Reporting by Jody Godoy in Alexandria, Virginia; Editing by Richard Chang

</body></html>

Disclaimer: Ang mga kabilang sa XM Group ay nagbibigay lang ng serbisyo sa pagpapatupad at pag-access sa aming Online Trading Facility, kung saan pinapahintulutan nito ang pagtingin at/o paggamit sa nilalaman na makikita sa website o sa pamamagitan nito, at walang layuning palitan o palawigin ito, at hindi din ito papalitan o papalawigin. Ang naturang pag-access at paggamit ay palaging alinsunod sa: (i) Mga Tuntunin at Kundisyon; (ii) Mga Babala sa Risk; at (iii) Kabuuang Disclaimer. Kaya naman ang naturang nilalaman ay ituturing na pangkalahatang impormasyon lamang. Mangyaring isaalang-alang na ang mga nilalaman ng aming Online Trading Facility ay hindi paglikom, o alok, para magsagawa ng anumang transaksyon sa mga pinansyal na market. Ang pag-trade sa alinmang pinansyal na market ay nagtataglay ng mataas na lebel ng risk sa iyong kapital.

Lahat ng materyales na nakalathala sa aming Online Trading Facility ay nakalaan para sa layuning edukasyonal/pang-impormasyon lamang at hindi naglalaman – at hindi dapat ituring bilang naglalaman – ng payo at rekomendasyon na pangpinansyal, tungkol sa buwis sa pag-i-invest, o pang-trade, o tala ng aming presyo sa pag-trade, o alok para sa, o paglikom ng, transaksyon sa alinmang pinansyal na instrument o hindi ginustong pinansyal na promosyon.

Sa anumang nilalaman na galing sa ikatlong partido, pati na ang mga nilalaman na inihanda ng XM, ang mga naturang opinyon, balita, pananaliksik, pag-analisa, presyo, ibang impormasyon o link sa ibang mga site na makikita sa website na ito ay ibibigay tulad ng nandoon, bilang pangkalahatang komentaryo sa market at hindi ito nagtataglay ng payo sa pag-i-invest. Kung ang alinmang nilalaman nito ay itinuring bilang pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, kailangan mong isaalang-alang at tanggapin na hindi ito inilaan at inihanda alinsunod sa mga legal na pangangailangan na idinisenyo para maisulong ang pagsasarili ng pananaliksik sa pag-i-invest, at dahil dito ituturing ito na komunikasyon sa marketing sa ilalim ng mga kaugnay na batas at regulasyon. Mangyaring siguruhin na nabasa at naintindihan mo ang aming Notipikasyon sa Hindi Independyenteng Pananaliksik sa Pag-i-invest at Babala sa Risk na may kinalaman sa impormasyong nakalagay sa itaas, na maa-access dito.

Babala sa Risk: Maaaring malugi ang iyong kapital. Maaaring hindi nababagay sa lahat ang mga produktong naka-leverage. Mangyaring isaalang-alang ang aming Pahayag sa Risk.